If you think Broner of the last 5 years is as good as Broner of the 5 years before that, that is on you. Have fun getting respect for that one.
I pointed out facts and included videos. Broner took the fight to Maidana and it was FAR MORE COMPETITIVE than Pacquiao-Broner. Pacquiao dominated Broner. Maidana beat Broner, but it was a fierce back and forth. I also highlighted what advantages each fighter had. Maidana Vs. Broner is a very competitive fight. Pacquiao Vs. Broner was one of Pac's easiest fights. Therefore, Pacquiao was more dominant.
Broner is 29, guy. Dude is still in his physical prime. In his last 2 fights, he walked down Mikey and Vargas. He came into the Pacquiao fight in the best shape of his life. You're acting like Pacquiao wasn't 40 and shot. Maidana Vs. Broner was a very competitive fight. Pacquiao Vs. Broner was one of Pac's easiest fights. Therefore, Pacquiao was more dominant.
He’s better. You don’t think the broner of today would still whoop demarco? The broner of 5 years ago lost to fighters below Pac, Mikey and porter in Maidana. So what exactly has changed? Apply some logic, I know it’s hard for you but try. Was broner beating elite fighters 5 years ago like porter and maidana and then suddenly losing to B level fighters today? Or has his performance been consistent throughout? Just. Dumb.
Broner came to fight. But everyone has a plan until they get hit. After the first left hand, Broner was like, I'm not dealing with this! Broner is like the fifth guy promising to go to war with Pac to KO him only to change their mind after he the first left hand.
So he got up for Maidana and Mikey, but not a 40 year old where a win would bring him more star power and bigger paychecks than he already enjoys? Good logic.