Why Does Tyson Fury's Drugs Ban Get Overlooked?

Yawwwwwwwnnnnnnn.

 

It could be as simple as time. Journalists are working very hard online. Writing about the drugs test requires accuracy and probably an editors oversight because the eventual UKAD judgement came about after a couple of years legal argument. The news article you're quoting from is a short piece, the author may not have the time or the expertise to cover the issue in more detail without getting into dangerous waters legally speaking.

 

Valid question

 

Cos everyone in the media is afraid they will be called racist by the Fury's who ALWAYS play the gypsy card despite being a family of utter scumbags who deserve critism.

 

Because he’s white. The innocent black man gets more stick for taking drugs even though the white man is guilty and he’s not.

 

Mate dont be astonished by anything the BBC say.

 

Scissors saying it how it is..watch out these sensitive mods dont ban u tho bro, any mention of race and they freak out.

 

Who are you to judge his family...take a look at your own mate. Dont belive the media, its poison. Wake up.

 

I just think it's a case of "such is life"
We tend to overlook immoral acts if the person is close to us or we like the person. However if we dislike the person and they come up in conversation we tend to "stick the boot in" by dwelling on any immoral or lawbreaking they may of done.
Its the same in boxing I think. If we like the boxer we tend to ignore any past discrepancies they may of had.
Where if we dislike the boxer we will bring up their past history.
Its all double standards really.

 

Drugs cheats drug dealers and violent criminals , my family is levels above those lowlifes

 

Massively. Same as his comments that offended people. When called out by more mainstream reporters he just no comments shrugs his shoulders and hides behind his " i was depressed" gimmick. If that doesn't work he calls people racist because he lives in a shitty house...

 

Perhaps it's because it was one of the most inconclusive cases we've seen. A warning of "elevated levels", a charge sixteen months later. No ban served by Hughie or Tyson. It was a shambles from day one

For the record, I think Fury probably did take something. But UKAD messed the whole thing up and therefore journalists don't know what to be writing for fear of legal action. An absolute calamity by UKAD no matter how you look at it.

 

May also be worth pointing out that Dillian Whyte served a ban for a positive test but I don't think that's routinely mentioned in reports of his latest actions. Journalists, like others, are focussed primarily on what's happening now rather than what was in the past.

 

Exactly. Find the racial argument bizarre myself. Most drug cases in boxing are airbrushed. Probably because the authorities are a shambles.