Tyson Fury next opponent?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by pow, Feb 18, 2019.


  1. TonyHayers

    TonyHayers Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,863
    2,375
    Nov 1, 2018
    I don't get the need for a fight between now and the rematch. What's the point?
     
    Potwash, Holler and Jojojojo like this.
  2. Felix Sanchez

    Felix Sanchez Active Member Full Member

    1,090
    548
    Mar 5, 2006
    They both have increased exposure in the US following their first fight. Might not make sense from a boxing perspective, but probably does from a business one if they both get out again on US tv before a rematch.
     
  3. Holler

    Holler Doesn't appear to be a paid matchroom PR shill Full Member

    13,214
    25,212
    Mar 12, 2018
    Should help drive revenues, just like that warmup between Tommy Morrison and Michael Bennt did for the Lennox Lewis fight:

    This content is protected
     
    Glenn McKrory likes this.
  4. pow

    pow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,846
    3,991
    Apr 26, 2014
    A bit harsh as it is universally accepted he won the first fight. He was robbed on the night and don't believe he owes Wilder or his handlers anything.
     
    Holler, Mr Icaman, moog and 1 other person like this.
  5. Twentyman

    Twentyman You dog nonce! banned Full Member

    7,197
    14,789
    Apr 20, 2016
    I know mate, I don’t like saying it and as you know, I believe Fury won that fight easily. However, he shouldn’t allow boxing politics to get in the way of fulfilling his legacy, that WBC belt should be his and he should go and box Wilder’s head off to get it. The WBC have ordered it, Wilder can’t back out of it without getting stripped so Fury should grab this opportunity with both hands. I don’t want to hear talk of him not being bothered if he doesn’t fight Wilder/AJ. I believe he’s the best of the 3 but he has to go and prove it.
     
    moog and Scissors like this.
  6. im sparticus

    im sparticus There Ye Go. Full Member

    5,717
    3,718
    May 16, 2010
    I dont either.
    Apparently Arum thinks it generates more money later in the year and maybe if he showcases fury in an interim fight , there's some truth in that, I theory.
    But I just can't get past seeing how if one network wins the purse bid the losing network will let the other fighter fight on that channel.
    Also isn't the purse bids now about due.? Where does that leave purse bids if they are having intetim fights
     
  7. Scissors

    Scissors Posts are sponsored by Matchroom Full Member

    9,364
    14,007
    Feb 11, 2018
    It will only be a duck if they pull out of the purse bids or it’s won by another company so they refuse the fight.

    For someone who is not world champion to refuse a world title fight and what will be a career high payday it would be hard to argue that it’s not a duck.

    But at present there’s nothing to indicate the above happens, so let’s wait and see. If it does then it’s inexcusable.
     
    moog and Jojojojo like this.
  8. Potwash

    Potwash The Real Untouchables Full Member

    4,611
    6,173
    Dec 13, 2017
    Lets just say Fury or Wilder lost the fight before they had a rematch..would it still go ahead?!
     
  9. pow

    pow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,846
    3,991
    Apr 26, 2014
    I disagree.

    I don't see it as a duck as he won the first fight. With Fury's popularity increasing and Joshua's decreasing his self worth in a percentage split is going up by the day. Fury is the man of the division the pressure is on the other two to get him in the ring. how about Joshua step up to the plate and fight either Wilder or Fury? Fury don't need either of them they need him now. He is the man of the division.
     
    Yatezy likes this.
  10. Scissors

    Scissors Posts are sponsored by Matchroom Full Member

    9,364
    14,007
    Feb 11, 2018
    Fury isn’t the man of the division. He didn’t win the first fight, it was a draw. He doesn’t hold a belt. Joshua has a fight already. Joshua and Wilder don’t need him, he needs them. They’re champions, he’s not.

    Regardless of splits it would be a career high pay day and a world title shot.

    IF and it’s a MASSIVE IF, he pulls out then it’s a duck. It’s inexcusable.
     
    Sampneb likes this.
  11. pow

    pow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,846
    3,991
    Apr 26, 2014
    Peoples champ and Lineal champ. Respect means more than money and belts.

    No Duck as he has already beaten him.

    Boxing fans know.
     
  12. Potwash

    Potwash The Real Untouchables Full Member

    4,611
    6,173
    Dec 13, 2017
    Thats crazy..im a massive Fury fan and its all good and well saying he won the fight...but he didnt did he. It was a draw. Yes i thought Fury won but wasnt surprised it was a draw. It could of went either way. Go back and watch the fight without bias to one fighter. It was close.

    Fury isnt the main man in this division yet...we all know who is the champ, the main man. Lets not pretend otherwise.

    Please from one fan of Fury to another, dont act like you dont want the rematch to happen..it was so close they have to get it on again to settle it all. I dont want or care to see either man fight before the rematch.
     
  13. Journey Man

    Journey Man Journeyman always. Full Member

    4,943
    2,116
    Aug 22, 2009
    Does anyone else think if Fury / Top Rank / ESPN win purse bids that Wilder could vacate? Haymon would not want Wilder fighting on another channel, and he has previously paid his own champions to vacate. I can't remember too many recent examples but he paid Peter Quillin back in the day to vacate his Middleweight belt.
     
  14. Scissors

    Scissors Posts are sponsored by Matchroom Full Member

    9,364
    14,007
    Feb 11, 2018
    He’s held that belt hostage for years. There’s not a chance he vacates. Where does that get him?

    In reality, nobody has a clue what’s going to happen.

    Purse bids were scheduled two weeks ago today, how long was the delay?
     
  15. Drago

    Drago Member Full Member

    435
    418
    Jan 27, 2013
    About the ESPN deal:

    Wilder spoke the last weeks over and over again he was robbed in the first fight and the main reason was the ref Jack Reiss because he gave Fury too much time to recover.
    Wilder also said he and Finkel will never allow Reiss again and are looking for a "real referee".

    So i do understand why Warren and Fury want a backup in the USA because if Wilder s team can chose the judges, the ref, the gloves and the size of the ring, a replay of the first fight is possible if they go to the judges again.
    And if Fury would get knocked down again, a ref like "must go bay" Bayless will stop the fight immediately.
     
    Holler likes this.