Is Crawfords resume REALLY better then Mikeys?! (RESUME LISTED)

Not really. I’d say about even.

Crawford’s best wins are Gamboa and Postol while Mikey’s best wins are Salido and Broner.

 

This is all academic. Crawford was at 135 and 140 for 4+ years and Mikey was no where to be seen. If Mikey and his brother wanted that fight they would have made it. They would rather run their yap than fight Crawford because the remember what happened in the amateurs. Which fighter has improved the most since then?

 

of course it bumps crawfords. beating spence is his 5th division in which he becomes the man. pac has lost more rds vs jmm than mikey has lost in his life. i dont see how that would even be a question. h2h is a different argument, but beating spence is the best win anyone at ww would have, add his already hof worthy career, and he is your new p4p #1, should he overcome spence.

 

Why didn't he offer to fight Crawford when Crawford was at 140 for 3 years?

 

wtf does that have to do with anything i posted? only thing i can figure, is youre trying to make a case that mikey ducked bud because mikey didnt fight bud in that one month between mikey fighting above 135 for the very first time and bud leaving 140. is this what you are trying to say? if it is, then tell me, why did bud run up to 147 just 1 month after mikey moved up to his neck of the woods? was bud ducking?

 

Question if Garcia gets ko’d and When Crawford ko’s Khan is his resume then better?

It’s a tricky one because one loss doesn’t end a fighter and Garcia is massive underdog for first time in his career.

Also khan is glass chinned but it is another former world champion on Crawford’s resume.

But I believe Crawford when all is said and done will be remembered more highly than Garcia anyway ramble over.