A question why is no one calling out Crawford?

i would never give crawford credit for beating an old pacman past his prime. but thats my point if you rate a fighter so high and someone beats that fighter that you rated so high then the fighter that beat your highly rated fighter must be seen high

 

Okay, keep that same energy. Pac gets 5X more credit from you when he beats Thurman or Danny because you rate him so low.

 

oh hell yea i will give him credit why would'nt i if pac beats thurman garcia top welters today hell yea i would give pac credit . i would not take anything away from pac. But you on the other hand would bring out every excuse in the book and not give credit if danny or keith beat pac

 

Pac is 40 and he's not a well-preserved 40 like a Mayweather or Hopkins. He suffered one of the worst knockouts in the history of the sport late in his career. Pac can age very quickly and become completely shot overnight. This is the REALITY of an older fighter who's been in a million wars, not excuses.

So massive credit if Pac wins, but very little to the guy who beats him.

 

Just excuses homie you rating Pac will beat crawford is high . You only use certain logic when it applies to your fighter

 

Is Pac 40?

Is Pac always the smaller guy?

Wasn't Pac violently KO'd in the late stage of his career?

These are facts, not excuses.

 

by your logic then pac should not be given credit when he beat mosley and de la hoya because they both could of been shot over night correct . So credit to oscar and mosley if they had won against pac but very little credit to pac for beating past primed drained fighters

 

was oscar not drained ?? was oscar not 40??? those arent excuses my friend they are just facts oscar was old and drained when he fought pac and mosley was over the hill

 

Broner wouldn't be his best win because he would beat Broner just as easy as almost any fighter he has fought. Broner is not a big name but rather a big mouth. He has lost mostly all of his big fights.

 

No. Because they weren't the smaller guy and giving up size advantages to almost everyone they faced and they weren't violently one punch KO'd.

 

but they were old past it past there prime. you said so yourself that older fighters that have been in wars could age over night like mosley and de la hoya they aged over night

 

And take great pleasure in doing it. Crawford is a mean SOB he wouldn't take it easy on Pac.

 

You know nothing about boxing, guy. They weren't violently KO'd like Pac was. And they weren't giving up height, weight, and size advantages for years. You can't make the comparison. You're trying so hard, but the hate just always comes out and you end up looking dumb.

 

Crawford never seen speed and power like Pac's. I'd favor Crawford to win, but there's a real possibility Pac makes him into a runner/survivor.

 

Hey man its just a debate we are having i have my opinions and you have yours , you are just mad because i was using your logic against you. simple as that Good Debate though that was fun Android so what we learned from your words was that if crawford beat pac he would get no credit because pac was old. Beacuse old fighters could age overnight that is what you said. So by that logic Pac beat old fighters that aged over night in mosley and de la hoya