Vitali Klitschko would beat current top 3 heavyweights

because has never fought anyone of that calibre or above aside from wlad.
and sam obviously isnt much good, thats why hes lost to lower top tenners. But shes not terrible like Kubrat, hes never struggled horribly with a 40something when prime.

I said that a while back. but you keep asking....stranger and stranger...

 

because has never fought anyone of that calibre or above aside from wlad.

I said that a while back. but you keep asking....stranger and stranger...

 

Maybe post your list with supporting evidence as to where you believe Chisora is in the division? Anyone that isn't a Whyte nut hugger knows chisora is C level AT BEST. You're simply trying to elevate him to make the fact Whyte went 23 life and death rounds with him (and lost the first) look better.

 

Glad you finally answered the first question!

Now, the second question is, are you claiming Eddie Chambers and Robert Helenius are on the caliber of Wladimir Klitschko? Answer with just a yes or a no!

 

My point is, to find concrete reasons for what makes Vitali Klitschko superior to Kubrat Pulev as a heavyweight boxer.

 

I wrote that two pages ago.

ss to this new question, its a stupid one, Wlad was a unified champion.

 

Not the question I asked!

It can only be answered with a yes or a no!

So I ask again, for the second time:

Are you claiming Eddie Chambers and Robert Helenius are on the caliber of Wladimir Klitschko?

 

Haha you think pulev would be competitive with vitali?

 

And how old was Vitali at the time?

 

Sure! Why not?

 

"Answer with just a yes or a no or else my question is in danger of falling apart"

 

PROVE my question is falling apart!

Or better yet,

explain how it's even possible for a question to 'fall apart', when it's only used to attain information / knowledge about a particular topic.

Go ahead, whilst we all have a laugh at your false characterization!

 

My dude, I am not the one being laughed at here.

 

1) I'm not your dude!

2) Glad to know you can't provide an answer / an explanation!

If you do provide an answer / an explanation, we will all laugh at your stupidity for a false characterization. If you don't, then we'll all simply laugh at your cowardliness.

Either way, your loss!

 

for a while he might, but hes never going to win. His best strategy consists of waiting for old guys to gass out so that might work on 42 year old vits, thats all I see in your favour.

Pulev was brought in to fall, the guy was a clown.