They are just that. Just physical beast. Don't get me wrong they have skills but there skills really don't stand out and eventually what keeps them at the top is their physical advantages will fade . I mean these boys are beast athletically with their speed, athleticism,power, physique ,size. Especially Spence he's just got great genetics beast genetics that I have not seen in a while in boxing being very solid. But that's my point what will happen when their physical advantages start fading . I predicted Jermall would be at his most dangerous for the next three years . 29-31 and Spence the same .But after 31 I see them losing to lower competition.what are your thoughts ?
jermall just got humiliated by a 35 year old who hadn't went more than eight rounds in half a decade.
Still see him as a strong physical specimen he's only strong but that's about it. His size youth and the jab is all he's got it's still a threat to anyone in the division
If you told me BJS or Danny beats Charlo I'll believe you both fighters have legs and athleticism to get out of the way. But I can definitely tell you Charlo would give Canelo and GGG all sorts of problems
isn't he? how would you know? he has no promoter last i knew. charlo cherry picked him from the scrap heap and got humiliated. charlo should be wanting a rematch to prove his upside at mw isn't a crippled forty year old Argentinian.
Hey that's a fair argument korobov coming off a layoff fighting Charlo like that is impressive. But let's just say we through korobov in there with Danny and Canelo and they went the distance with korobov .we don't know right . The only way to actually find out of if Charlo actually fights these tops guys hell even fighting sulecki derevyanchenko is a step forward
Fair enough I'm not gonna say he isn't because he could . For all we know he could turn up being another eubank Jr. for all we kknowm.My pointis this ,when he does step up what excuses will they come up with . If he fought Jacobs next year they will say something like "oh Jacobs was never the same after GGG Canelo fights " if he fought GGG "GGG was past it " I see those excuses coming out . would you give him credit if you chose GGG or Jacobs to win but lost to charlo would you give him credit or would you pull out the excuse notebook