yes he was once good, but so was joe bugner. When he fought 3G, he was on a near 10 fight loss streak, barely broken by insignificant wins. He was brought in to fall for a paycheque but didnt read the script. No shame though, it was for a bum title so who cares? I dont. You are entirely wrong about the semi shot ouma, but had you been on about prime ouma you would have a point.
The retort was made towards the TS and his troll attempt that Khan beating Maidana was a better win and than any of Golovkin's opps and no one he fought was at Maidana's level. My answer ( Ouma) wasn't about him being prime or post prime when he fought Golvokin, just that Ouma had definitely attained the same level as Maidana during his career.
Khan literally went life and death with the shell of Julio Diaz, damn near lost, if one round changes, in the UK!!!
Just a little piece of advice: you try too hard. Decent trolls manage to leave that small semblance of doubt they might actually believe what they write, and it takes smarts to pull off that trick. You over-egg everything and in doing so blow your cover. In short, you're not bright enough to play the game you want to....
the thread got derailed a bit in the heat of the moment. Khan has the better win in Maidana, even if Crawford KO's him. Khan on his best day looked>GGG on his best, so far. If Khan somehow beats crawford there's simply no debate.
Explain why the Maidana win is so great to you. He was already beaten by Kotelnik, then got blanked by Devon Alexander shortly after losing to Khan. His best win is over Adrien Broner. That's 'impressive'....
Like I said, not smart enough, neither with your final sentence - which you don't believe - or your belated attempt to sound reasonable, which is such an obvious effort get your troll back on track. Cover blown dude... move on....
GGG`s defense is far better Khan`s was v Maidana, GGG landed more shots on Canelo in the 1srt 5 rounds of his two bouts v Alvarez than Khan did, GGG`s offense was better and more creative v Canelo than Khan`s was.