Been working on this for about a week Obviously a follow up of the top 50 https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/my-top-50.625460/page-1 But I want to get up to one hundred, but I find it's easier to do that in stages Here it is 1. Sam Langford 2. Harry Greb 3. Muhammad Ali 4. Ezzard Charles 5. Sugar Ray Robinson 6. Benny Leonard 7. Ted Kid Lewis 8. Henry Armstrong 9. Archie Moore 10. Joe Gans 11. Jack Britton 12. Tommy Loughran 13. Maxie Rosenbloom 14. Mickey Walker 15. Willie Pep 16. Ray Leonard 17. Barney Ross 18. Soilder Bartfield 19. Joe Louis 20. Roberto Duran 21. George Dixon 22. Jimmy McLarnin 23. Harry Wills 24. Tony Canzoneri 25. Lennox Lewis 26. Jack Johnson 27. Charley Burley 28. Gene Tunney 29. Jimmy Wilde 30. Floyd Mayweather Jr 31. Manny Pacquiao 32. Evander Holyfeild 33. Marvin Hagler 34. Packey McFarland 35. Carlos Monzon 36. Jose Napoles 37. Emile Griffith 38. Bob Fitzsimmons 39. Kid Gavalin 40. Tommy Hearns 41. Young Corbett III 42. D*ck Tiger 43. Tiger Flowers 44. Barbados Joe Walcott 45. Pancho Villa 46. Fighting Harada 47. Manual Ortiz 48. Freddie Walsh 49. Lou Ambers 50. Eder Jofre 51. Roy Jones Jr 52. Sandy Saddler 53. Stanley Ketchel 54. Sam McVey 55. Julio Cesar Chavez 56. Oscar Del a Hoya 57. Juan Manuel Marquez 58. George Foreman 59. Alex Arguello 60. Micheal Spinks 61. Salvador Sanchez 62. Billy Conn 63. Bernard Hopkins 64. Young Corbett II 65. Tommy Gibbons 66. George Foreman 67. Larry Holmes 68. Kid Chocolate 69. John Henry Lewis 70. Freddie Steele 71. Rocky Marciano 72. Oakland Billy Smith 73. Wladimir Klitschko 74. Lloyd Marshall 75. Joey Maxim
I think you`ve rated Lewis far too high, GGG is a far better fighter P4P than Lewis was and Lennox never fought someone as good as Canelo, I don`t feel Canelo beat GGG, but I feel he`s also a better fighter than Lennox was.
Mark, your very educatated in the sport, so I have to ask is this sarcasm due to the resent (insert name) is better GGG threads
No I really didn`t thinjk Lewis was that good nor his opposition, he had great reach and power and fought very well v a faded Tyson, but I Canelo and GGG are something else, I feel both fighters are vastly underestimated, and Lewis used to be my favourite fighhter before I started watching film studies and learning more about fundamentals, there is a great study on Lewis showing how to beat te shorter Tyson but he clinched so many times early on.
That's OK, I think Canelo will creep up into the 75 in the coming years, but GGG (one of my fav fighters) is shy of 100 unless he beats Canelo. I like Lewis' wins over Holyfield and V. Klitschko over Canelo, and he has good wins over Ruddock, Golota, Mercer, Morrison as well as a few others
Lewis too high, Kid Lewis too high, Rosenbloom too high, Marciano way too low, Fitzsimmons too low (all just my opinion ofc) Like I'm legit interested to hear how you have Lewis 50 spots up higher than Marciano in a p4p list, especially when Marciano was smaller than his average opponent and much more consistent, and Lewis, larger and caught more often
Marciano might have been smaller, but every real top contender he fought was an old man, Charles, Louis, Moore and Walcott were all very far removed from there prime I know he was a very small HW hence why I have him above, Klitschko and other HWs in my top 10 but Lewis faced much better opposition and in his prime was much better than Marciano imo Lewis' lower end (still world class) wins are as good as Marciano's best. People like Mercer, Morrison, Tua, Golota and Tyson. Also I find it very difficult to believe Lewis got caught more than Lewis from what I've seen of both Marciano got hit alot more just had a better chin. I don't really rate Fitsimmons too highly coz he didn't beat very many good people. The opposite for Rosenbloom
Fitz was beating heavies as a Middleweight and beat the Middleweight champ (nonpariel), light heavy and heavyweight champ lol Imo Charles and Walcott were prime and Rex Layne is one of the greatest contenders ever. Also Holyfield and Morrison were past prime and Mercer was (imo) robbed of a decision against Lewis
I know who Fitsimmons beat, I just think other wins were better (eg: Lewis beat Vitali, Tua and Holyfield) I just can't agree that Charles was prime, and even if he was, he was a career LHW, He was a veteran of 95+ fights when he faced Marciano and was imo not what he was when he beat Moore or Louis or even Walcott. Walcott was really past it, like it was his last two fights and was about 37/38 for them. I don't think Mercer was robbed, I thought it was a draw that could've gone either way. Morrison was past it but through his own doing not Lewis' and he was coming off one of his best wins (Ruddock). I know some of Lewis' are questionable but either way he got them and thats what counts.
An interesting stance, considering those at his training camp said he regained a spark for training and many consider him lasting the distance against Marciano to be one of the finest performances of his career Moore had well over 100 fights when he won the light heavyweight championship, was he past prime? Walcott aged well and gave one of his best fights to Marciano. Some fighters just age well, like B-Hop. Some age poorly, like Tyson. Walcott fought like a man possessed to retain that title
It certainly isn't ok for you to arrive on the forum and make posts that make people want to throw up. But this stuff is hard, especially when you are kicking off.
I'll go through my main disagreements. Don't mean to be rude, just want to be concise. I get these lists aren't easy. Henry Armstrong too low I'm not sure Moore can be that far ahead of Burley Ray Leonard is a tough high IMO Harry Wills is way too high Not sure what Soldier Bartfield is doing there Lennox Lewis and Jack Johnson are too high I think Wilde and McFarland should higher Bob Fitzsimmons is way too low McVey is way too high Oakland Billy Smith wasn't terrible, but I don't see him on a list like this, especially not ahead of Lloyd Marshall I think the heavyweights in general are too high, but I really don't see an argument for including Wills and McVey It also seems you're rating guys like Oakland Billy Smith and Bartfield who got a few decent results in a ton of fights with top opposition too high.