Vasyl Lomachenko vs. Sugar Ray Robinson, who takes it?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Luizio, Apr 13, 2019.


Vasyl Lomachenko vs. Sugar Ray Robinson, who takes it?

  1. Vasyl Lomachenko Points

    10.6%
  2. Vasyl Lomachenko KO

    13.2%
  3. Draw

    3.3%
  4. Sugar Ray Robinson Points

    9.9%
  5. Sugar Ray Robinson KO

    62.9%
  1. fistsof steel

    fistsof steel Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,197
    3,059
    Nov 13, 2010
    Robinson is another Level...
     
    Gatekeeper and Pimp C like this.
  2. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,062
    24,051
    Feb 19, 2007
    lmao, srr is lucky salido wasnt around back then, he woulda got stopped at the gate, lol.
     
  3. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,149
    Dec 23, 2013
    omg the stupidity.
     
  4. Birmingham

    Birmingham Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,075
    6,789
    Jan 13, 2017
    There is truth to his post, he was a head of his time, boxings evolved also, there was crudeness back then a bit
     
  5. Alo2006

    Alo2006 R.I.P Sean Taylor Full Member

    10,021
    1,414
    Jun 28, 2006
    Free post thread!
     
  6. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,149
    Dec 23, 2013
    If you were to set up a fight for SRR against lets say Spence and gave him 3 months to train in todays era in prep for the fight by the time he stepped in the ring he would be prepared to deal with Spence and would knock him out cold. SRR was not crude he had average defense but his offense was top of the line even by todays standards. His speed, skill and power at his size 5`11 wouldve been a problem even in todays age.
     
  7. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,062
    24,051
    Feb 19, 2007
    theres crudeness now. i dont think boxing has evolved, i think its devolved. i think it peaked between 70's and 90's and has been devolving ever since. i see better athletes today, but i saw tougher, more skilled men back then.
     
    roughdiamond, Loudon, Pimp C and 5 others like this.
  8. Birmingham

    Birmingham Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,075
    6,789
    Jan 13, 2017
    Sorry Bro, you got me wrong, his opposition sometimes was very crude back then not SRR
     
    RingKing75 likes this.
  9. Birmingham

    Birmingham Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,075
    6,789
    Jan 13, 2017
    I agree in general, there's better training methods, but a jabs a jab a left hook is a left hook, what's evolved really ? Nutrition ? I actually think the 90's was the best most competitive time in boxing, the welters, Heavies, middles, every division had multiple all time greats
     
    DoubleJab666, RingKing75 and bandeedo like this.
  10. Birmingham

    Birmingham Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,075
    6,789
    Jan 13, 2017
    His speed and skill imo was what was spectacular and timing, he could land the perfect shot in a split second
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  11. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    If you think a jab is a jab and a hook is a hook then you simply don’t understand boxing. There are nuances and different contexts, different game plans and styles from all over the world. It’s not the World Series of baseball anymore. It’s absurd to think that boxing is the only sport that hasn’t changed and evolved since the 90s.
     
  12. Birmingham

    Birmingham Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,075
    6,789
    Jan 13, 2017
    Obviously there's SLIGHTLY different ways to every punch thrown, but you think they couldn't throw the same physically 50/60 years ago ?? Why ??
     
  13. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    I’m stupid when you clearly have no concept of styles and context? You’re an idiot to think of comparing Salido to SRR. That’s like me comparing Lomachenko to one of the guys SRR lost to.
    SRR was 5cm taller than Lomachenko. How easy is SRR to hit compared to Lomachenko, despite Loma’s aggressive style? SRR’ power and chin was good relative to his bum opponents at the time who were poor athletes going for long jogs and doing sit ups. You can’t compare ancient eras to a new style of boxing, Lomachenko is clearly an evolution of boxing and better than anything seen before. Even now you can see how far the top 90s styles have fallen behind, never mind SRR era.
     
  14. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    Pace was slower (15 rounds), athletes were poor and didn’t know how to train, boxers were in different weight classes than they would be now (so a middleweight then is a welterweight today, and obviously a welter looks faster and more skilled than a middle) due to same day weigh ins, boxing is now more of a global sport, soviets and Cubans brought in different styles that are dominant over bread and butter US style, I could go on and on.
    I once saw a side by side of Ali and Haye throwing the same punch and the difference in speed and power was absurd, with Ali being an anomaly of his time. You have your head in the sand if you can watch boxing from the 80s and you can’t see the difference between that and Lomachenko.
     
  15. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    He was 5’9 and Spence would beat the **** out of him. Did they even have southpaws in SRR’ day?