An honest comparison between Lomachenko & Crawford

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MetalLicker, Apr 20, 2019.

  1. MetalLicker

    MetalLicker I Am Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2011
    Messages:
    26,162
    Likes Received:
    31,467
    I'm a fan of both guys, but it's clear as day that Lomachenko has better defense than Crawford. Every time I see Crawford fight, he gets hit clean with flush shots. Bud has better power, which makes it seem like he has better offense, but I think Lomachenko has better punch placement.

    Power - Crawford
    Offense/Punch Placement - Lomachenko
    Defense - Lomachenko
    Footwork - Lomachenko
    Ring IQ - Even
    Overall Skills - Lomachenko

    They're both great fighters and they have their own strengths. All categories are very close with the exception of Power and Defense. Crawford's power is undeniably better and Lomachenko's defense is better than Crawford's. If they're both the same size, I'd pick Lomachenko to edge Crawford out.
     
    Rock0052 likes this.
  2. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    19,033
    Likes Received:
    4,324
    Loma definitely has the higher end skills.
     
    Birmingham likes this.
  3. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    2,302
    Loma is better p4p. If Crawford was a natural 130, he would look like a more skilled Walters. Loma would beat him.

    Crawford has size, strength and power combined with great boxing skills, makes his boxing skills look that much better. For example, take that power away so that he couldn’t stop gamboa and that fight would have gone to a close 12 rounds.
     
    Birmingham likes this.
  4. Brujo

    Brujo Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2015
    Messages:
    266
    Likes Received:
    143
    Loma was dropped by Linares.
     
    pacas likes this.
  5. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    19,033
    Likes Received:
    4,324
    That doesn't really have anything to do with the topic. Loma also has a loss. Crawford also likes to fight midgets and old ass ones too. Those points are not on topic either.
     
    h8me, CST80 and vnyc like this.
  6. Holler

    Holler What a cocky saucy ****** this one is Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2018
    Messages:
    13,731
    Likes Received:
    26,241
    Crawford is excellent but Lomachenko is exceptional.
     
  7. Brujo

    Brujo Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2015
    Messages:
    266
    Likes Received:
    143
    The claim is Loma has superior defense despite the fact he was dropped by a C-level opponent.
     
    pacas likes this.
  8. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    19,033
    Likes Received:
    4,324
    And Crawford got wobbly from an old ass and faded midget.
     
  9. CST80

    CST80 The Hesitant Nihilist Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2013
    Messages:
    262,499
    Likes Received:
    268,178
    This content is protected
     
  10. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    52,103
    Likes Received:
    23,328
    Loma is just better all round. Crawford has more power, but I bet you that Loma ends his career with a higher KO ratio
     
  11. MetalLicker

    MetalLicker I Am Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2011
    Messages:
    26,162
    Likes Received:
    31,467
    Doesn't matter. That was more recklessness than anything else, not because of defense. Crawford gets hit more per fight than Lomanchenko.
     
    Rock0052 and h8me like this.
  12. Tomato(e) Can

    Tomato(e) Can Emmanuel Dapidran Pacquiao. banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2018
    Messages:
    6,300
    Likes Received:
    5,643
    :lol:
     
    CST80 likes this.
  13. Brujo

    Brujo Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2015
    Messages:
    266
    Likes Received:
    143
    And? You said my post wasn't on topic. I clearly demonstrated it was. Now you're tossing out a red herring.
     
  14. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    19,033
    Likes Received:
    4,324
    WTF, you wanna argue about something stupid like your point? No one agrees with you lol.
     
  15. Brujo

    Brujo Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2015
    Messages:
    266
    Likes Received:
    143
    Read that again, but slowly.