Usyk Already Has A Top 5 Resume At Heavyweight Before He's Made His Heavyweight Debut.

Fighter A beating fighter B who beat fighters C, D, and E does not make resume's, otherwise we would be saying how great Amir Khan' s resume is. Look who he's beaten and who they beat.

Especially when we're including amateur bouts.

In fact, the more I think about, the more of a joke the thread title is.

 

Even if you don't count Wilder for Fury, beating Klitschko far eclipses any single win of Whytes.

 

Like who?

 

Yes but not as a whole, Whyte has Chisora twice (obviously so does Fury), Parker, Browne, Halainuis and Tann.
Fury has Chisora twice, Hammer, Cunningham and Klitschko. It's pretty close
I wouldn't mind either being above, but i think Whyte is over, although I'm a massive Whyte stan

 

Parker, Fury, Pulev, Ortiz, Hunter and maybe even Joshua

 

I can see your point, Whyte has been on a good run but I think Klit and Wilder put Fury ahead of him for me.

Is a fight I'd pay to see

 

Love to see that Fight.

 

It was this logic that the fanboys used to predict that Usyk would be the undisputed cruiserweight champion before Usyk even turned pro. If you want to call that desperation, then go ahead.

 

Yeah Gassiev, Breidis, Hunter and Glowacki are on the same level as AJ, Wilder and Fury, LOL. Unifying the CW and unifying the HW are not the same thing.

 

Unifying CW for somebody who hasn't turned pro is comparable to Unifying HW for the undisputed CW champion. Are you actually that dense? Not to mention that while they were making claims that the still amateur Usyk would be Cruiserweight champ they were also saying he would move to HW. So far, Usyks doubters are the only people being proven wrong.

 

These clowns making endless troll threads, boxing fans are the % wise the biggest hole of trolls

 

So you think Usyk is going to beat AJ, Fury and Wilder then do you ?

 

Please tell us you're trolling for fun because WTF else could you be doing here

 

So you count WSB bouts as being part of a Pro resume here, to boost an Usyk argument, but don't count them for Lomachenko, so you can claim Lomachenko has six less Pro bouts than he really does?