[COMPUBOX] Golovkin out landed Canelo in 19 rounds out of 24

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Gennady, May 5, 2019.


  1. lordlosh

    lordlosh Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,759
    7,483
    Jun 4, 2014
    Won both fight clearly, but boxing is not judged on compubox, which a lot of time is incorrect. I would say in reality Golovkin landed a lot more than Canelo in both fight.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  2. therussian

    therussian Member Full Member

    170
    80
    Nov 23, 2014
    i forgot to mention one thing. it`s not about effectiveness, it`s about visible evectiveness. when a fighter lands 10 solid punched without effect and the opponent delivers visible damage with only shot, then the 10 shots have no relevance.
     
  3. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,628
    80,877
    Aug 21, 2012
    This guy Dino is pathetic. He's just a classic hater; fixates on a boxer and tries to tear them down relentlessly.

    Fact is, Golovkin made Canelo miss many times, and sometimes wildly, in their second fight, but - surprise, surprise - nobody who was giving Canelo "extra points" for his defence in the GGG/Canelo 1 fight came to give GGG "extra points" for making Canelo miss in their second fight. Double standards. To me Golovkin did better the second time round. He actually hurt Canelo and landed much heavier punches. Canelo also did better than in the first fight and that's what makes (some) people think that he won. He didn't.
     
  4. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,203
    23,828
    Jul 21, 2012
    The only statement thats dumb is this .

    If were talking about visibly landed power punches , then GGG landed about two in fight #1 and about 3 or 4 in fight #2.

    All of his punches were mostly jabs that were either blocked , parried or slipped. Compu box accounts for missed jabs. It literally says so on their wiki page.

    When a guy like Golovkin connects clean you know about it. A consistently landed jab would have left Canelo busted up badly. None of GGs jabs left a mark nor did they do any damage because the majority of them were defended.

    His hooks , right hands and body shots were neutralized and taken out of the picture. The judges saw that , its called ring generalship.
     
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.
  5. therussian

    therussian Member Full Member

    170
    80
    Nov 23, 2014
    please delete your account from this forum. i get headaches from what you are texting.

    FYI: ring generalship means how a fighter dictates the pace and tempo of a fight by positioning perfectly, not technical abilities like to blocking or neutralizing punches. thats why we have some fights where people win clearly but doing a lot less then his opponent.

    in both fights canelo had a horrible ring generalship. ggg hunt canelo in the first fight. in the second fight canelo tried to be more brave but ggg footwork was just superb. he had not a single moment on the ropes or beeing confused. i repeat ggg`s footwork was a MASTERCLASS. you can watch both fights. your arguments why canelo won are coming back to you, because what you say why canelo did maybe good in first, you are critizing ggg for that in the second fight. thats hilarious.

    you should practice your arguments beforeopening your mouth.
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2019
  6. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,029
    27,653
    Jul 26, 2004
    Stopped caring as much about what compubox says when I saw videos demonstrating their inaccuracy.
     
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.
  7. h8me

    h8me Member Full Member

    307
    278
    Nov 14, 2017
    Are you seriously telling people to learn the rules and then creating some scoring criteria from your own imagination?
     
    sdot_thadon, PhillyPhan69 and BCS8 like this.
  8. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,628
    80,877
    Aug 21, 2012
    I agree compubox is innaccurate but they tend to get the gist of a round fairly well. I remember scoring myself where they had (for example) a round 20-12 to one fighter, and when I scored it I had it 18-11 or 17-10 for example.
     
  9. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,628
    80,877
    Aug 21, 2012
    "If were talking about visibly landed power punches , then GGG landed about two in fight #1 and about 3 or 4 in fight #2."

    His own imagination, it is clear.
     
  10. h8me

    h8me Member Full Member

    307
    278
    Nov 14, 2017
    Check once more who am I replying to.
     
  11. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,203
    23,828
    Jul 21, 2012
    K , so when Canelo boxes off the backfoot and reduces GGG to a jabber , its horrible ring generalship??

    But when GGG boxes off the backfoot and loses , its a masterclass?? Well done for exposing your bias and hypocrisy.

    Btw , GGG stalked Canelo in the first fight , he didn't hunt him. A hunter doesn't leave his prey off the hook like GGG did over and over.

    GGG who was supposed to be great at cutting off the ring decided it wasn't worth letting his hands when Canelo lay on the ropes .
    Thats why he wouldn't throw a single body shot , which is the natural punch against a guy who is trying to stick n move around the ring.
    That is poor ring generalship - gameplan and ring generalship go hand in hand. Everybody knew that stamina and endurance is a major weakness for Canelo . yet Canelo is one who committed to a consistent body attack.

    Canelo's ring generalship , tactics and punch variation was all superior. Part of the reason Golovin moved on the backfoot in fight #2 was to gain a breather from Canelo's body attack.
    Thats why he dropped his hands and sucked in huge breaths. It wasn't a conscious decision to to fight negatively behind the jab. He got boxed backwards while having his bodily organs rearranged. Thats why he needed a year out of the ring any why he needs a confidence boosting fight against #97 ranked Steve Rolls.

    Go and learn about ring generalship and the proper criteria in how to score a fight , because you clearly don't have a clue.
     
    PhillyPhan69 and Villasteve like this.
  12. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,628
    80,877
    Aug 21, 2012
    You are right; I thought you were talking about Dino
     
  13. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,943
    3,300
    Apr 26, 2010
    But that's not the scoring criteria...is this real life?
     
  14. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,943
    3,300
    Apr 26, 2010
    I can only tell you that Canelo is 1-0-1 vs GGG, that I can tell you for a fact...the rest is just speculation.
     
  15. Dance84

    Dance84 Unicorn and seastar land Full Member

    8,066
    5,453
    Oct 11, 2017
    Facts