Canelo vs Jacobs looked rigged!

nobody is forgetting any of that, stop posting it. people can think past that, thats why nobody mentions it, not because they cant see "the idea".

 

I didn’t say he isn’t special, I said he lacks the desire to be great. You don’t fight like the fight is already in the bag when you’re the challenger.
He was so ecstatic that he didn’t get KO’d vs G that he collapsed as soon as the bell rung. What does that tell you?
He didn’t go there to win and we saw the same thing vs Canelo.

 

I predicted it https://www.boxingforum24.com/threa...-decision-this-saturday.628513/#post-19811019

Canelo taking such a risky fight ahead of the third GGG fight could only mean one thing (fix).

People forget that Boxers only take home a fraction (25% ?) of their purse after taxes and expenses. Jacobs got probably millions in an offshore acount, the same Golovkin did.

Today it doesn't matter the fight is real or not: the big money comes from the mafia, not the fans: they need reliable people to keep the gig afloat and launder these dollars all year round.

Canelo is the rain maker: he gives you a shot if you play by the house rules, and that means you don't try to win.

 

Previous fights yes, in there fight, no. That **** was as rigged as ggg vs canelo. Those were shoes, not fights. They were cooperating and following guidelines.

 

Yes and Canelo v Golovkin in particular with Adelaide Byrd showed they don't give a **** not just we as fans think but folk in the media who's job it it is to write about Canelo and Golden Boy.
Even the Clenbuterol thing was funny imo as the punishment actually suited him and allowed him to have surgery and put the fight off till later,aging Golovkin some more.
Has Canelo been anyway effected by it?
what angered me is I was naive enough to think Golovkin was to important to the WBC to stuff on the cards and I think he once was as they forced Canelo to fight or drop the belt and after this Canelos behaviour was quite disgusting,refused their trinket belts they made for him,threatened to not go back and imo I think he forced the WBC into promising Canelo exclusivity and probably got assurances he'd be ok whatever the scorecard,thing is they didn't take into account that Canelo would lose so many rounds to make it impossible to give him the win.

 

Those members only want you to believe they're naive: in reality they're part of the gig: these people are constantly on boxing forums influencing and manufacturing opinions to cover their traces .

Another example is youtube boxing blogger Dwyer: he works for the casinos and sends gamblers the wrong path: his preferred play for the fight was Jacobs covered by both fighters inside the distance .

 

Well, considering it from the human side, fixing fights is pretty harmless and extremely rewarding for the fighters: you pretend to do your best, avoid any real and potentially career damaging punishment, and you beat uncle Sam, which sets you for life.

The only suckers are those who paid the tickets and TV broadcasts. Gamblers got shafted of course, but that's part of the game.

 

Once you get started on this thinking "this fight was fixed or that fight was fixed" you can pick and choose which fights were fixed according to decisions you don't think were how you saw them. I never thought anything was fixed in boxing.. If I did it would ruin the sport for me all the way back. I have to have faith in the sport. People love this sport.