Floyd Joy Sinclair has once again had his resume boosted to a new level with this Jacobs win

Was he at his best? No. That was my argument and I specifically said that. He was years before his prime

 

Was Floyd at his best? He was 36 years old.

 

That's a completely different point. One I agree with

 

If he was green, he wouldn't have been able to defeat Trout to partially unify the championship at 154lbs in his previous fight.

Not at one's peak =/= being "green".

 

What's not an opinion is that Canelo is heavier and better today, and that Fluid drained his ass.

 

What's not an opinion is PBF retired undefeated and beat Canelo with ease while GGG went 0-1-1 against him.

 

My opinion of fighters that break the rules (IV gate) and cherrypick their fights is that they are not quite as great as their nut-danglers think they are. We're still going to see Floyd go broke and lose to some kid in our lifetime. Better stock up on tissues.

 

That would bring you great joy I'm sure because you're an irrational hater who couldn't see him beaten in the ring so you want to see him beat outside of it. Typical hater LMFAO! I bet you do this type of **** in your life outside of ESB to ****ing beta.

 

LOL I can hear Pimple's sniffles from here

 

I can see your beta nerdy lame ass from here to. Get your money up hater and quit praying for another man's downfall outside of the ring.

 

agreed

 

Mayweather didn't beat Danny Jacobs.

 

If you are holding Golovkin to official cards than Mayweather did not beat Canelo with ease.

Irrelevant anyway. What you are proposing is the equivalent of someone arguing Abe Simon is better than Ezzard Charles.

 

PBF beat Canelo with ease I don't need scorecards to tell me when a clinic is taking place. Even if you thought GGG beat Canelo there is no way you could compare the two. GGG-Canelo 1&2 were close fights PBF-Canelo wasn't.

 

LOL the scorecards say PBF really struggled with a green, drained Canelo. We all know how credible judging is.

Don't change your tune now