Kellerman: “Canelo won against Trout, Lara, Jacobs and Golovkin. He is the Golden Boy.”

Yeah you can tell he’s a snob within 30 seconds of hearing him talk. How many competitive sports has the guy even took part in through his life?? Seems to be an expert on soo many!

 

You ain't gonna learn much then..

 

Canelo is what boxing needs!!! He fights s the best fighters for Christ sakes!!!

This dude is the truth! He really son me over in the second GGG FIGHt!

Those that hate oh him are letting envy and bias cloud their judgement!

 

FFS. The rematch was a close fight and Canelo got the nod.

Go look at all the stuff GGG normally does (march forward, throw powerful body shots) that he didn't seem willing to do Vs Canelo. Why was that in your opinion?

 

Exactly!I get the feeling he could done whatever he wanted and I read something about his upbringing,schooling and being primed for the job.
I never realised that class thing is as big a thing as it is in the UK?

 

Yep the first fight was a joke and quite literally with Adelaide Byrd but the second fight even though I had it for Golovkin,there's no way you can say Canelo didn't deserve that win.
I think what's starting to gripe folk is wondering what it would take to beat Canelo on points?
As an example of what we now see each week is the Hurd fight,the result was right but look what Jackson was up against,he had to win nearly every round Inc a 10/8 round and they still found rounds for Hurd,those decisions are far worse than the Canelo one imo.

 

Kellerman practically admits he knows Mayweather & Canelo got unfair advantages by being the cash cow. So why pay any creedance to a word he says. In my opinion Kellerman DKSAB & I'm serious

 

The only newsworthy thing Kellerman should be mentioned for is farting and trying to cover it up..

Obviously has a loose anal passage for some reason if he can't hold a fart in he knew was coming.

 

Should also be said what an exciting,clean fighter he is too,never resorts to wrestling or fouling.
He'd be a lot more likeable without Oscar and all those questionable scorecards,point being he would of won those fights anyway without the need for the cuckoo scorecard that dogs his fights.

 

Yes but close matches the champ should get the nod not the challenger unless corruption is involved...

 

He basically said Canelo went unbeaten through those run of fights because he got 'house fighter' privileges and biased judging and went on to add he was okay with that. Because Canelo is - in his opinion - good looking.

Yup, can't beat punditry of that calibre....

 

One of the sad truths to this world, people LOVE pretty people and allow them to do or say whatever they want.

 

that's bull ****

 

Really so a 50/50 fight should go to the challenger??

 

Yep as easy as breaking wind