Just How Great a Heavyweight Was Ken Norton?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by RulesMakeItInteresting, May 12, 2019.



  1. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,853
    5,365
    Feb 26, 2009
    sometimes being iconic or famous or whatever in big fights, elevates a person beyond the skill.
     
    Sangria likes this.
  2. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker Full Member

    24,272
    7,636
    Jul 15, 2008
    Well that settles it.
     
  3. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,966
    5,308
    Feb 10, 2013
    Ive heard it from several people who had knowledge of it not the least of which was Rick Farris who was in the gym and saw it happen.
     
    greynotsoold likes this.
  4. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,016
    10,233
    Mar 23, 2019
    I too have Holmes significantly ahead 9 to 6 in the Norton fight. I'm not sure Norton ever looked so impressive...even in a defeat that was obvious a bit more early in that fight than some would believe. I still don't think Ali beat Norton decisively, ever. But hey to each their own.
     
  5. Golden_Feather99

    Golden_Feather99 Active Member Full Member

    683
    1,020
    Apr 23, 2019
    Didn't Frazier do the same? Frazier's resume past Ali isn't great. Rocky Marciano made a career out of beating older legends. Gene Tunney beat an old legend. Riddick Bowe's resume consists of wins over a much smaller heavyweight, a cruiserweight perhaps. All these fighters are still regarded as great heavyweights. Why is it different with Norton?
     
  6. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,576
    1,949
    Aug 26, 2004
    He gave Ali and Holmes and Young great battles but once a fighter reached the tipping point of power Nortons weakness was backing up-he could not and usually got stopped by punchers -top 50-100?
     
  7. john roberts

    john roberts Member Full Member

    334
    205
    Sep 5, 2017
    Norton was a good heavyweight, the fights with Ali make his resume better, but when people understand that Ali didn’t fight Norton until his 43rd professional fight after hundreds of amateur fights and 43 professional training camps and all this after a three and an half year lay off then obviously for a reflex fighter like Ali he was no where near is prime, Norton could almost certainly not have beat Ali in the years between 65-70 before and during his lay off and many wear and tear fights earlier. So Norton was good but considering these facts if the fights were in Ali’s prime years it probably wouldn’t have been anywhere near close as it was in the seventies IMO.
     
    Last edited: May 14, 2019
  8. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Frazier was a lot better than Norton the stuff he was doing in all his fights v Ali was brilliant, Norton was pretty basic but he did jab with Ali which was clever, Futch told him to do this and it stopped Ali setting up his shots. Were there 50 heavyweights that had the power to KO Norton though because his chin wasn`t in the top 50 and I don`t know about his defense either.
     
  9. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Barkley had a better chin P4P than Norton.
     
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,189
    34,916
    Apr 27, 2005
    Yet Norton may have beaten him more times. Frazier btw is a top 10 ATG.

    Asking if there are 50 heavyweights with the power to KO Norton is simplistic beyond belief. Did Ceuvas have the power to KO Hearns?
     
    young griffo and mark ant like this.
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,189
    34,916
    Apr 27, 2005
    Norton was a much better fighter.
     
  12. Hookandjab

    Hookandjab Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,618
    548
    Feb 19, 2014
    I agree. That also applies to Bonavena. He gave Ali and Frazier problems, but was trounced by Ellis, defeated by Lyle, decisioned by an old Patterson, etc.
     
  13. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    He certainly fought better v Ali than Barkley did v Duran.
     
  14. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Hearns was far more skilled than Norton.
     
  15. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,183
    2,123
    Nov 6, 2011
    Frazier basically cleaned out the division with Ali absent (no fault of his own) I understand your point about Bowe and Tunney. Tunney is a bit trickier as a lot of fighters that were around that light-heavy limit, some even smaller were fighting at heavyweight.
     
    Golden_Feather99 likes this.