If Pacquiao beats Thurman

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by tinman, May 21, 2019.


  1. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    37,316
    29,774
    Feb 25, 2015
    Most people think he is. It's one thing to face tough competition. Pacquiao's prime was from 2003-2009. And he fought a lot of tough guys. And rose up all the way to Welterweight and fought many guys in or close to their prime.

    He fought Barrera, Marquez, Morales and Cotto during that time. Very, very, very, very high level fighters. Now it's one thing if Pacquiao had just lost to all those guys and couldn't beat any of them. Then he would be known as a guy who fought so many top level guys, but couldn't win. But he destroyed Barrera, he destroyed Cotto. He beat Marquez and he lost to Morales in a close and competitive fight. The only guy who could beat Pacquiao in his prime was Erik Morales. It's not like he lost to Marquez, Cotto and Barrera. He beat those guys. Something that people tend to ignore. Pac won almost all the big fights in his prime.
     
    Bofo24 likes this.
  2. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    I don’t even know how you can cherrypick a fighter physically in his prime 10 years younger than you undefeated world champion with the best resume at WW bar Pac?

    God forbid anybody has a tough fight. I guess if anybody fought Floyd after maidana 1 it would have been cherry picking?
     
    Bofo24, kirk, Love2box and 1 other person like this.
  3. Paranoid Android

    Paranoid Android Manny Pacquiao — The Thurmanator banned Full Member

    7,393
    5,900
    Jul 21, 2017
    Keep in mind that it was Gimp C.

    :lol:
     
  4. African Cobra

    African Cobra The Right Honourable Lord President of the Council banned Full Member

    27,342
    10,125
    May 29, 2007
    Pacquiao has beaten much better fighters than Thurman.
     
  5. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,174
    35,346
    Jun 23, 2005
    No they don't he was not even ranked as a top 20 fighter in the Ring's best fighters since WW2 and this was before he even fought PBF and Pac didn't even make the list. You don't move up that much when you've lost to PBF and Horn and beat the likes of a checked out Broner and a shot Lucas. You're wrong he's not a top 12-18 ATG that's crazy talk.:deal:

    The October issue of Ring surveyed many boxing writers and historians on the greatest fighters of the Modern Era (post-WWII). They were each asked to rank the 20 greatest fighters with 1st receiving 20 points, 2nd receiving 19, 3rd receiving 18, etc... with first place votes bracketed. The top 20 is as follows (HT to chrismart83 on scene):


    1. Ray Robinson - 396pts - (17)
    2. Henry Armstrong - 339 - (1)
    3. Muhammad Ali - 324 - (1)
    4. Roberto Duran - 296
    5. Joe Louis - 293
    6. Ray Leonard - 258
    7. Willie Pep - 246 - (1)
    8. Archie Moore - 189
    9. Julio Cesar Chavez - 171
    10. Ezzard Charles - 164
    11. Pernell Whitaker - 132
    12. Floyd Mayweather Jr - 118
    13. Marvin Hagler - 117
    14. Carlos Monzon - 98
    15. Eder Jofre - 86
    16. Sandy Saddler - 82
    17. Roy Jones Jr - 80
    18. Rocky Marciano - 77
    19. Bernard Hopkins - 66
    20. Ike Williams - 55
     
  6. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,174
    35,346
    Jun 23, 2005
    I am saying Thurman not looking great in his last fight is a reason why he chose to fight him now. I proved that to you last week. If Thurman looked like the P4P top 10 fighter he was before the layoff against Lopez they wouldn't want anything to do with him. Those are facts.
     
  7. Rilz

    Rilz Ball don't lie! Full Member

    6,839
    4,739
    Aug 5, 2007
    I think you are right, Pac will be the slight favorite once the public money arrives. That is why I was so happy to get that price.
     
    bandeedo likes this.
  8. Paranoid Android

    Paranoid Android Manny Pacquiao — The Thurmanator banned Full Member

    7,393
    5,900
    Jul 21, 2017
    Just stop your BS, son. If Spence-Thurman was happening, you'd say it was a great fight and that Thurman just needed a tune up. That's why you haven't criticized Spence for fighting Porter. Porter looked wretched and should have lost to Ugas. You give free passes to black fighters.

    :deal:
     
    Bofo24 likes this.
  9. Baneofthegame

    Baneofthegame Active Member Full Member

    1,136
    1,128
    Aug 19, 2017
    I was thinking this, people had Thurman in the top 3 at the weight, he has one poor outing and suddenly he is shot to pieces and Pac is cherry picking? Sure thing.
     
    Bofo24 and kirk like this.
  10. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,174
    35,346
    Jun 23, 2005
    You give free passes to anyone who isn't Black you nerdy POS beta.:deal: I never said Spence-Porter was a great fight but it did need to happen. I want Spence-Crawford but they fight for rival networks and promoters so it will probably never happen, I also said Crawford was dumb to stay with Top Rank because PBC had all the name fighters at 147. I always said Spence would body Thurman and accused Thurman of ducking Spence where have you been? Pac is fighting Thurman because of how he looked him his last fight period end of discussion.
     
  11. Paranoid Android

    Paranoid Android Manny Pacquiao — The Thurmanator banned Full Member

    7,393
    5,900
    Jul 21, 2017
    Spence is fighting a guy who looked no better than Thurman in his last fight. Thurman got caught, but he dominated Lopez for 8-9 rounds. And he was out for 22 months. Thurman won his fight. Porter looked dreadful and should have lost.

    Spence also called out Canelo and Oscar's now offering $20 million. Since then, Spence ain't talking about wanting that smoke. I better see you saying Spence ducked Canelo if he don't take that fight. But you already gave Floyd a free pass for stepping to Pac, challenging him, scouting him at the Broner fight, and then walking away.

    :deal:
     
    Bofo24 likes this.
  12. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,174
    35,346
    Jun 23, 2005
    Except Porter shouldn't have lost that's your opinion he won the fight. A fight between Spence-Porter should've happened already Porter was accused of ducking Spence so now he's fighting him. I couldn't careless about Spence fighting Canelo if he wants to dare to be great and take on Canelo at 160 then so be. With that said he should not call out Canelo if he has no intention of fighting him that's some clout chasing **** and I'm not a fan of it. PBF was not scouting anyone he's retired and if anything he was showing support to Broner.
     
  13. Paranoid Android

    Paranoid Android Manny Pacquiao — The Thurmanator banned Full Member

    7,393
    5,900
    Jul 21, 2017
    Stay consistent. Keep the same energy regardless of race.
     
    Bofo24 likes this.
  14. TEAM_LOMA

    TEAM_LOMA This is Boxing Full Member

    1,563
    1,827
    Mar 13, 2019
    Can't wait for this 50/50 matchup!!! First blockbuster of the summer $$$
     
    kirk likes this.
  15. The Ogdoad

    The Ogdoad Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,121
    1,187
    Feb 27, 2017
    Pac has more nuts than Mayweather. Mayweather opted to fight Berto instead of Thurman.