Wilder. The best managed/advised HW? This is not a sneer. I have read peoples comments on here but have looked at it a bit differently. Many HWs in Europe and I think especially in the UK get stepped up very quickly and thrown in deep very quickly. Sometimes I think this can burn a fighter out or think they can be in too many wars too early on that I think are damaging later on. Wilder had 32 fights before he went for a title shot. Wilder got his title shot against Stiverne and not Klitschko who was considered the top HW at that time His 3 fights leading up to his title shot Firtha, Scott and Gavern. Wilder went into his title chance with more fights that the champion. So was able to get alot of experience to prepare him for a good career. Now here is where I think his team may have done well. Joshua has come on the scene and before he has had his title shot faced undefeated Whyte in a tough fight, then faced an undefeated puncher for his title chance, fights undefeated Breazeale after that, then fights Klitschko, undefeated world champ Parker, Povetkin. Joshua is taking big risks and getting the titles, but in taking these risks can be draining for a fighter, where Wilder would only need one fight against Joshua and he could get all of the titles, where for Joshua to get all the titles he would have had to have had 4 fights Im sure many will say Wilder fought Fury, which he did, but at that time many felt Fury wasnt back to his best and had been away for a while and lost a huge amount of weight. I think it was taking an excellent opportunity as Fury will likely be fitter and stronger at the weight as time goes on. Had Wilder have won, it would have been considered by many as a top win. Although I thought Fury was a clear winner, Wilder has the title and looks now from rumours I have read that he could after the Breazeale fight be facing Ortiz and Kownacki. I have also read a rumour that Fury could be facing Whyte who Wilder has not appeared to interested in fighting. So if Wilder were to have not to have fought Klitschko, Parker, Povetkin, Whyte or beaten Fury he could still get all the titles with just one win and I think many would forget his road to getting there Fury to get the rematch may have to face undefeated Schwartz, Whyte etc Joshua having faced the above. Fantastic match making and management? You decide
Wilder can capitalise on there wins Look at how it may be for Whyte if he faces Fury Whyte facing Browne, Parker next Rivas (let's not forget that Ortiz is often rated due to his stoppage of Jennings which is who Rivas beat also) and rumoured that he could be facing Fury They are tough draining fights and one win over Whyte and Wilder would then have that name on his resume and chances are people would start to forget the Fury result That is hypothetical as I'm giving an example if Whyte wins all the above but hopefully you see what I mean
Its called prize fighting for a reason. highest non PPV fight :2.1 million Highest PPV ( his only one ) 7/8 million . He also would have seen NO other pay days over 5 million bc he lost to Fury ,so his career cherry picking would have ended there and he wouldn't have to worry about pricing himself out bc he would have had his hand out then. This was one of the dumbest moves ever in HW history . Trying to get established as a marketable figure AFTER TEN years and relying on the other HW champion to win bc you wouldn't be relevant otherwise is about as smart as a HW champion announcing he wants to get pregnant.
It could be. Well, there are a lot of HWs, so let's just narrow it down to the top three: AJ — he needs exposure in America, but advised to fight on a streaming platform with a quite limited subscription base, so it's not him; Fury — I doubt he listens to advice very much, probably just needs a couple of yes-men around him; Wilder — his advisers know that he's very unbalanced fighter (has limitations but strong points as well) so they lead him very carefully.
Wilder and his management have done well at avoiding the good fighters and ''risky'' fights, what it boils down to is what Wilder's ambitions are. Does Wilder want to hold on to a belt, make some money and fight ''easy'' low-risk fights against fighters like Molina, Stiverne II, DB and Arreola or does he want to unify the division and fight the best fighters? If the ambition is {1} Then Wilder's team have done a good job at protecting him, if it is {2} then they have failed Wilder.
So your saying by taking an easier path and benefiting from a rising star who has bought attention and money back to the division is being well managed? I don't see it that way, Joshua's path is tougher but it's also more rewarding financially as well as in terms of legacy. Sure Wilder's long and relatively easier path to a title paid him good money but far, far less than Joshua has made and seen him deriding and not taken seriously for much of his reign as champion. Joshua emerging as a heavyweight star and draw was a huge windfall for Wilder and his team, it's allowed him to profit from the attention Joshua brings to the division, that along with the arrival of DAZN has seen money flood into US boxing, especially at heavyweight. But any idiot can profit from a windfall, I mean a person winning the national lottery isn't seen as financially savvy, just lucky. If anything he's been managed shrewdly. They've done well to keep him champion, ensuring most of his defences are against weak opposition signed to Haymon, on home soil, quickly extracted themselves from the one fight they were scheduled to fight overseas vs Povetkin before anything could be cleared up and the fight allowed to go ahead, favourable officiating in his 2 toughest fight, this is something his managers should be commended on they are clearly looking out for their client here, but also for themselves to be fair. But I think most of what success Wilder's had isn't down to his advisors but down to himself. It's he who raised his profile, shouted louder for Joshua when his own people did nothing to create interest in a possible fight, created the Bronze Bomber persona, probably went behind his teams back and emailed Hearn that $50 mill offer to force his teams hand which is all the twists and turns of the negotiations so far was the one good move his side has made.
Wilder is carefully managed. He has too many flaws to be moved quickly or to be put in risky fights. It's good for his pocket but probably bad for his legacy, although with the American press hyperbole that may even be artificially propped up too. The two best heavies he could of fought years ago Wlad and Povetkin are not options now. The best outside of them that he did fight Fury won almost every round he wasn't knocked down in. All the flashy big knockouts he has cant change the fact his resume is soft for a belt holder, softer than Joshua's and his legacy in the big picture will probably not be very good.
He is managed well but his power helps him. His power looks for real, although in the past with big punchers guys looked like one punch knockout guys and then time goes by and the power looks less for some reason. Maybe the guy gets older and is not as sharp or they lose a little enthusiasm, or guys learn to take it. Either way, Wilder power is for real yet his chin does not look good. If I look at his body, his legs are too thin to take many big punches. So he better get guys out of there before they hit him on the chin. And he is quick enough to do that probably. The way he fights he will not stay undefeated too long.
Interesting points from OP . I have thought at times whether AJ has been pushed to early . I mean is he the quickest ever unified HW Champion in terms of how few fights before being unified ??? It would not surprise me . You may have a point also that it could burn a boxer out being pushed to far to quickly . So far so good for AJ tho . But that is a point that needs to be thought about . On the flip side with Wilder him having a much more slow burning career with many fights could be a better option but being a WBC HW champion you shouldn't be up and coming or a work in progress , you should of achieved something . With some 40 odd fights he has only really faced questionable opposition he does not have the definitive fight against a top opponent . Wilder's time was in the shadow of a dominant Klitschko who was pretty much indefatigable and dominant . There was never really Wilder on an international level , he seems a US interior fighter (still does) not a champion of the likes of Holyfield or Tyson or Lewis . He really sprang into the ether after Fury defeated Klitschko as the other champion who does not really count . The HW WBC seems more like the American domestic belt rather than a World Title right now . Wilder's career with the PBC seems like the last throw of the dice for PBC as AJ and Matchroom will hold all the HW belts otherwise . Best managed ? Nah , best advised ? Nah . Best protected ? yes and biggest mouth without a doubt . Wilder and his management have been the Machiavellian type , cling to power no matter the cost .
Essentially this. Wilder's in a great position to make decent money and retire undefeated so long as he doesn't step up. His management have sufficiently built up his fanbase to the point where he can make a couple of million per fight and never have to fight anyone particularly dangerous. In that respect Wilder is sitting pretty. Considering how raw he was and still is that's quite a feat.
Wilders time at the top is running out and quickly. One of the hardest punchers ever, but it’s julian Jackson power. Fast twitch muscles, long limbs, explosiveness. This is going to go down rapidly in the next 2/3 years. They say power is the last to go, but that’s clubbing George foreman/joe Joyce power. Wilder needs to make a move as he is also the oldest out the big 3
This wasnt quite the point I was making. Wilder has not had the big fights Joshua has had or even a Klitschko fight like Fury had but Wilder only needs the one Joshua win to be a unified champ whereas Joshua would have had to go through 4 fights for the same luxury
I think wilder would like to be the top unified champ like many other HW. His route to it though may not be like Joshuas if you see what I mean
No Im saying if Wilder were to get the Joshua fight and win, he will have been managed well in that he would be the man and not have taken the same route as Joshua to get there ie Klitschko, Parker, Povetkin etc Now this is close to what I mean. Yes I agree Joshua has had the tougher route and fought the bigger tougher fights and is the main man because of this between the two, but when it comes to legacy, I would guess that if Joshua and Wilder fought and Wilder won, it would be a bit forgotten behind that loss. Unfairly I would say but happens. Wilder would then have been considered the man of that generation even though he wouldnt have had to do what Joshua did Not disagreeing with any of this. Think you may have misunderstood me a bit or I didnt explain myself overly well Right, so if Wilder got the Joshua fight and all of the belts would he not be the man? I guess many people would come to the conclusion that because Joshua had beaten Povetkin and Wilder (if it were to happen) beats Joshua than less would remember him not fighting Povetkin or Whyte and the hype of Fury looking to have beaten Wilder to many I expect would be forgotten. This is me speculating but I have seen it before in other divisions and matches I would strongly favour Joshua at this time. Its just a what if thread