Golovkin: “Saunders is not a serious opponent, Rolls was the best available for June”

So you're not seen as a fanboy eh @shadow111 ? I can't believe I'm the one who has had to break this to you.

 

There is no comparison. Shadow presents his arguments with facts, logic, and civilly. The most active GGG fanatics are very disrespectful, don't usually debate, and believe GGG to be some kind of God.

 

This content is protected

 

Yes and obviously I've been very effective to cause this clown to embarrass himself like this trying to come at me and failing miserably. How sad.

 

Yet I have never seen you successfully refute anything he's posted.

Sounds like you're sour grapes because Shadow so eloquently states his opinion about Canelo and GGG and he makes sense.

You GGGoons are very insecure and can't deal with criticism.. Way too emotionally invested in GGG.

 

Why would I be bent out of shape? I'm content with the result of the Canelo GGG bouts. The first bout GGG was recused but the judges couldn't deny Saul Alvarez in the rematch. The draw was like a blessing in disguise, it showed how versatile Canelo is and that he doesn't need to box on his toes or be that patient to put a whooping on GGG. He did it Mexican Style and you like many other GGG fanatics just can't accept what happened. That's being bent out of shape.

 

Sugar is very insecure. I mean to come at me like that out of the blue he must have had all this bottled up inside for some time, waiting for the perfect moment to try and expose me, only to get swiftly countered like how Canelo countered GGG in the first bout. Using somebody's aggression against them is like my speciality which he's finding out the hard way. Eye catching counters making fools look silly !

 

Hahaha... Love it.

Maybe now that GGG is with Banks, Sugar88 will become more versatile!

 

Haha. You're corny as ****.

I was actually talking to another poster about you and then you started crying all over this thread about how you were being mischaracterised as a Canelo **** gobbler when you are very much known as exactly that. There's nothing to expose, you've been running wild with this crap for ages and it's there for all to see. The funny thing is you acting like me laughing at it here is the first you've heard of it.

 

Haha I highly doubt that, Sugar is very one-dimensional and limited as a fighter ! You give this guy angles he falls apart.

 

You Canelovers are something else. Someone thinks your bull**** is pathetic = the must love Golovkin as much as you love Canelo. Wrong.

 

You were talking about me to another poster? Sheesh man get a freakin Life LMAO. Look at you all obsessed with me for not being a GGG fan boy. You continue to bury yourself as a legitimate poster.

 

You really want to discuss Canelo with me - that would be great. I mean, it wasn't like you decided who you thought would of won that fight before it happened is it?

Which was it - you or that dips hit ISAL who thought the draw card against Mayweather was justified? When you're that deep into your mancrush what chance does anyone have of getting you to look at it objectively?

 

You have no legitimacy on these boards. And I don't give a **** about you not liking Golovkin you moron. It's your obsession with Canelo that I don't like.

 

Firstly pretending you didn't know that when that's what you responded to is corny AF and two you live for this kind of attention otherwise you wouldn't ***** yourself out so embarrassingly any time Canelo is mentioned.