Golovkin: “Saunders is not a serious opponent, Rolls was the best available for June”

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Gennady, May 29, 2019.


  1. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,488
    9,491
    Aug 1, 2012
    I'm not obessed with Canelo you tool lmao.
     
  2. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,488
    9,491
    Aug 1, 2012
    Are you talking about the guy who suggested clenbuterol was a steroid. See when you try to come to the aid of somebody who so clearly got something wrong because he's on the same "team" as you, you make an ass out of yourself in the process.
     
  3. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,338
    Feb 4, 2012
    I've quoted this for hilarity. Now show it to someone close to you and see if they don't try to stage an intervention as you must be in deeeeep if you don't know how much of a fanboy you are.
     
    BCS8 and iii like this.
  4. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,488
    9,491
    Aug 1, 2012
    It is a hilarious accusation. For years I've been calling out fan boys. For you to call me one then to double down on it saying I'm obsessed with Canelo is absolutely hysterical.
     
    IsaL likes this.
  5. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,338
    Feb 4, 2012
    I can't believe you have the audacity to deny it. No shame my dude, you truly have no shame.
     
    BCS8 and iii like this.
  6. iii

    iii Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,832
    4,091
    May 3, 2016
    ??? Surely this is not a surprise to you...these trolls iSAL, Dancer & pleb boi Shadow of a real man are trolls & is all you can expect.
     
    C.J. and Gennady like this.
  7. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,872
    Apr 14, 2009
    Give it up you are just digging a deeeper hole for yourself with each post
     
  8. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,518
    18,181
    Oct 7, 2006
    The question is why do you get so mad?

    I can disagree with someone's opinion and not throw a hissy fit like you're doing.

    So some people feel Canelo beat GGG, instead of crying and bitching about someone having a different opinion why don't you just counter what you disagree with using logic, stats, and facts?

    You come across as a real turd when you make things personal simply because someone has a different opinion to yours.
     
  9. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,518
    18,181
    Oct 7, 2006
    Its hilarious to hear some of these dudes call others "fan boys" lol.

    I think I've seen enough of your posts to know that if someone started saying Canelo is the best MW ever, or that Canelo would beat HWs, or that Canelo is the most avoided fighter you, just like myself would call them out.
     
  10. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,518
    18,181
    Oct 7, 2006
    This is how a discussion goes with these guys:

    Reasonable fan: I thought Canelo beat GGG in a close fight. I can however see why someone may have seen GGG winning.

    GGGoon: You're a ****ing fanboy, you should die, Golovkin probably got your mother pregnant!

    Reasonable fan: I gave Canelo rounds 1-5, in rounds 4 and 5 he slowed down the pace and focused more of defense but still managed to land the more telling punches to GGG's jab, most which were measuring jabs.

    GGGoon: You are delusuional, you're embarrassing yourself, GGG was robbed! Do us all a favor and jump off a bridge you troll!!

    Am I right or am I right? lol
     
    shadow111 likes this.
  11. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,338
    Feb 4, 2012
    I find you to be disingenuous, agenda driven morons and today it pissed me off. If Golovkin was the Mexican and Canelo the Kazakh then you'd flip your position. Try not to feel to bad though as you're not alone, a lot of the pro Golovkin guys would do the same.

    You don't want logic, stats and facts. You're rabid fanboys who do the necessary mental gymnastics to confirm your own bias.
     
    iii, Clean & Crisp and Boxcel like this.
  12. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,518
    18,181
    Oct 7, 2006
    Wrong in your first sentence and wrong in your second sentence.

    My position wouldn't change because I use the 10 pt. must scoring system to score and judge fights.

    And for your second point, I want honest and civil debate. I don't want a fanboy or hater making things personal simply because we don't see eye to eye.

    You are welcome to have your opinion, it would be nuch more fun if you laid out yoir argument civilly using logic, facts, and stats all within the 10 pt system than talking s*** because I don't agree that Golovkin was "robbed".
     
  13. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,338
    Feb 4, 2012
    Your telling me how I find you to be? Good one genius.

    And you wish this was about Golovkin - it isn't. I'm sick of you two numbskulls flooding the boards with your one note fan statements. This could have just as easily been directed at one of the boards other subset of morons who support one particular fighter no matter what. It just so happened to be Shadow and predictably as Canelo Fan Club Vice President you rode in on your clenbuterol fed horse to come to his aid.
     
    Clean & Crisp and BCS8 like this.
  14. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,488
    9,491
    Aug 1, 2012
    You sound a little upset, it might be a good idea for you to lower your salt intake, you could blow a gasket.
     
  15. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,518
    18,181
    Oct 7, 2006
    Again, your posts have nothing to do with boxing and all to do with your insecurities.

    If you are so unbias why don't you ever say anything to the countless GGGoons who actually do flood the boards with anti-Canelo gibberish?

    Leave your feelings out of this.
     
    Ph33rknot and PunchersChance. like this.