One of the judges had AJ ahead and winning

I knew the scorecards. You were babbling about Joshua going back to hiding in the UK. I pointed out to you why he hasn't needed hometown advantage. You bring up these scorecards. I tell you this was in the US. You come back with insults because you have nothing else to say. And now you double down on the same dumb ****. Lol. I'm done with you. You are too easy.

 

Good don't reply then. Obviously crooked judging can happen anywhere and it does just like here dumbass.

 

Only two were factored into the cards.

 

I know what you mean, there's a Gotti-like, in your face arrogance to it.

 

But he was ahead on the cards.

 

Um, you might want to rethink that.

 

1 pt ahead on 2 cards and down 1 pt on the last. WTF are you laughing at?

 

The fact that he was actually ahead. gdm said Ruiz was behind and thats why we should all hate Joshua. Well Ruiz was ahead on the cards, so should we now love Joshua?

57-56 was an acceptable card for Ruiz. Could have easily been 58-55.

People are making it seem like Ruiz was going to get robbed, which at the time of the stoppage wasn't the case at all.

 

He was going to get robbed. Stop being a contrarian. 4 KD and all he got was 1 pt up. Seriously you gonna start this garbage?

 

I agree the cards sucked but to be fair, only 2 knockdowns factored in and Ruiz was down himself, so that round was 10-8.

Round 5 was an AJ round and 1 + 2 were tight. However, I don't see how AJ won more than 3 rounds. Ruiz won the 3rd 10-8, clearly won the 4th, and clearly won the 6th. There really wasn't any way for AJ to be ahead.

 

********. The fight ended in the 7th round! What do those knockdowns have anything to do with the scorecards?

Only 6 rounds were completed: One of those rounds being a 10-8 for Ruiz.
You mean to tell me there is no way Joshua won 3 rounds? Making it 57-56 for Ruiz?
The third judge scored the 4th round to Joshua. Not much happened in the 4th.

 

I dont think you know what winning a decision means. If two judges score it for one and only one for the other that's called a majority decision .

Ruiz would still be winning that fight just not unanimously

 

I had Ruiz up 57-56 so it really is not that far off...+ he was cruising to a 10-7 rd if it was not stopped so he would have been up on all 3 cards and by 4 pts on 2 of them. Not a big deal really

 

Actually that is called a split decision. A majority decision is when 2 judges score for 1 and a draw card for the 3rd

 

You are correct. I realised after I typed it.
Still my point remains with two judges scoring it for Ruiz still means he wins