This is the same person who thinks Canelo drew with Mayweather... he is so damn biased that he will make up reasons to have his idol in a fight that he is getting embarrassed in.
I sincerely hope you are making a joke because Floyd flat out embarrassed Canelo in that fight. It was like watching a pro in the ring with a Jr High student.
OK so everyone in boxing is wrong except for a handful of trolls that dont know Rosin from resin & worship that red headed PED's abuser lol
I'm pleasantly surprised you posted your round by round, there wasn't much in round 1, it was a feel out round. You may have given it to GGG for being the aggressor, but would you begrudge anyone for giving Round 1 to Canelo? Remember you said GGG was blatantly robbed. How can you call it a blatant robbery when you yourself admit that the 6th was "extremely" close? You already gave Canelo 5 rounds, if you flip the 6th which you admit was extremely close that's a draw, and that's with you giving GGG close rounds 1, 4, and 5. You could easily have Canelo winning with Canelo winning round 1 and either round 4, 5 or 6 none of which were in any way clear GGG rounds. GGG outworked Canelo in rounds 7-9 despite Canelo landing the best shots of those rounds, I don't have a problem though with GGG winning 7-9. I'm not saying you can't make an argument GGG won. I do recognize the fight was close with several close hard to score rounds, however with that many close rounds, and with an "extremely close" round like Round 6 that you gave to GGG, there's no way you can argue GGG was blatantly robbed, especially when GGG still retained his titles. Giving GGG round 1, round 4, round 5 and round 6 rounds that could easily go to Canelo, then calling it a blatant robbery is silly. You've given GGG several close rounds and have him winning 7 rounds to 5. I'll take another look at rounds 1, 4, 5 and 6 though and will respond in more detail about these rounds when I get a chance. Either way, good on you for giving your RBR and giving your reasons.
No I'm not he literally claims that a draw was reasonable... I'm just warning you of his complete inability to remove his biasness and that when it comes to Canelo you cannot expect any objectivity.
You're lying. I never argued Canelo drew with Mayweather. The fact that you need to change the subject when I'm trying to have a discussion over Canelo GGG is telling.
Funny, in the first 3 posts, you showed your blatant agenda and hatred towards Golovkin, followed by the fact you have no idea how steroid testing works. Well done champ, keep up the good work. For what it's worth, you can't scream and yell "GGG fanboys" when you post more about that man than the typical boxing fan. You are what you consider a "GGG fanboy".
In Canelo's defense, he was very young but he was not competitive in the least. Canelo has made drastic improvements and will be difficult for anyone to beat at this point.
Yeah, okay, that about sums it up. To defend Canelo, he was very green. But Floyd schooled Canelo. There is absolutely no defending that. Many people had it a complete shutout. Why do you think Canelo has tried to emulate so many things from Floyd? Try watching boxing with two eyes open, you'll enjoy it much more!
Well Mayweather has a great resume and has deserved to be a top atg, on the other hand ggg resume sucks
Just my opinion but I think GGG still destroys Charlo and Jacobs hasn't looked very good since fighting GGG. BJS and Andrade are tricky but I think GGG would still be favoured to win. As for cashing out didn't he sign a 6 fight deal earlier this year?
So only GGG fanboys scored the first fight for GGG? The majority of fans who watched the fight scored for GGG, and there are more boxing fans who are either Canelo fans or neutral than GGG fans. So you tell me how that math works out.
