Galvatron having a mental breakdown and calling people out to fight because he's getting done in intellectually as per usual, so wishes to use brute force to get his point across like some base animal.
You're so incompetent that you aren't even able to form comprehensible sentences with correct grammar and you're calling me a 'mental case'? Oh the irony! Price and Fury never fought. So your point is irrelevant. As for Wlad, both Povetkin and Fury fought Wlad. But guess who won and actually stunned Wlad? I'll give you a hint, it wasn't Povetkin. It was Fury! There isn't any shred of wisdom with you. You think too highly of yourself. Consider getting off that high horse and actually looking at the mirror for once? Fact is, every opponent both Fury and Povetkin faced, Fury has stopped (Nicolai Firtha and Christian Hammer) whilst Povetkin couldn't stop any of those guys. Fact is, Fury stopped Steve Cunningham who is superior to Marco Huck since he stopped him conclusively. Whilst Povetkin couldn't even beat, much less stop Marco Huck after he had already been stopped by Steve Cunningham. Therefore, all the evidence points to Fury > Povetkin in not just power, but in every department. You do the math! What 'DURABLE' opponents did Povetkin KO? You mean DURABLE opponents like Nicolai Firtha and Christian Hammer? Two guys he couldn't even drop? Or the Povetkin who was popped for drugs? Funny how you criticize Fury for failing a drug test against Christian Hammer and discount that win, yet ignore Povetkin's KO streak during a period where he failed drug tests upon drug tests? I wonder why that is? Logic courses and English lessons are your best needs!
Trust me i would say it to your face, i‘m a big guy ( not fat ) who can handle himself very well in a fight but i‘m not a backwards brute who wants to fight people because they disagree with me on a boxing forum, i don‘t give a ****. And i don‘t give a **** about what you think about me as a poster, i also don‘t call every poster garbage because he disagrees with me, people just have different opinions.
You are showing yourself up here. As I said before the BBBoC do not change results retrospectively. Every test before and after the ban came up clean. He (understandably) threw UKAD out of his gym once during his recess from boxing post Klitschko, during which time he also tested positive twice for cocaine of which he freely admitted using to excess. Even during his time out he was still being tested by VADA and UKAD. You should really check your facts before posting rubbish on the internet. There was no refusual to give any samples, even during his recess he was still being tested by VADA and UKAD.
He done better than he ought to against Ortiz, didn't give Povetkin a good fight though IMO. Was like a sparring session for Pov
Many people including me and my friend had Huck winning that fight. It was a war that should have gone to Huck. Also Cunningham fight was not in britain. It was in New York
Hammer's one of those wins that looks a hell of a lot better in retrospect. No one thought much of him at the time, so Fury dominating him wasn't that impressive. Now that Hammer's got a couple of good wins and performances under his belt the way in which Fury handled him suddenly takes on a much greater lustre. It'd be like Fury dominating Schwartz, and Schwartz going on to beat Kownacki and take Wilder the distance. It's why I try not to rate wins over unknown guys too harshly. The unknown guy might actually turn out to be quite good.
Cunningham stopped Huck = fact. Povetkin went 12 rounds and won a majority decision against Huck = Fact Tyson Fury KO'ed Steve Cunningham = fact Everything else you stated is speculation and not fact! And another fact, Tyson Fury >>> Alexander Povetkin.
You‘re actually right, Povetkin controlled him over 12 rounds, i thought he had more problems but i have seen that fight only one time and couldn‘t really remember it. It still wasn‘t nearly as impressive as what Tyson Fury was doing in that ring.
