Why Is Only GGG Expected To Fight The Entire Division???

Do YOU post anything thought provoking yourself, Mr. cash cow fanboy? Oh boo hoo... sad that I insult the same few idiots here, as if you don't do the same. Hypocrite c*nt...

 

I think GGGs resume is very weak because he refused to take real challenges unless they came with a big pay day. Proof is Andre Ward, he would not even fancy the idea of fighting Ward unless he got the lions share, and even then he probably wouldn't have.

Rubio was washed up. Murray is not a good world level fighter, Lemieux was decent but probably Liam Smith levelish win, Brook was a WW (can't believe you included him lol), Jacobs was a good opponent, one of two good opponnets he fought and he refuses to grant him a rematch since the near disaster in almost losing that fight, Vanes Lololol), and Canelo is the 2 or 2 good opponents but GGG would ONLY fight him if he got 4 times his biggest payday otherwise he would not fight him.

Weak resume, especially when you consider the opportunities he had.

 

He should have been a MW sooner? According to who? Canelo can decide when he moves up in weight, not you. lol You're delusional.

Canelo had a total of three fights at 155 per his request and they were all non-title fights. The other two were requested by his opponents.
Now guess who has had three fights above his weight class?? That's right Golovkin. He's fought above the 160 limit three times.

yet another double standard by the GGGoon patrol. S*** on Canelo for fighting at 155, but when Golovkin fights between 161-64 its okay. LOL

Hypocrisy exposed!

 

Who were those fights over 160 against? Were they top contenders in his division? Because that's exactly what Canelo did at 155, fighting Lara, Angulo, and Kirkland. Thre was NO freakin need to fight those over 154. Especially the Lara fight. Idiot....

 

Rubio is solid.
Lemieux and Murray are good wins I would rate over Cotto and Liam Smith.
Brook is better than Khan whom you hilariously included on your Canelo list.
Vanes is solid and deserved the nod over Charlo.

I don't see a case for Canelo having a better resume at MW, let alone even this same period of activity. It comes down to activity, Golovkin was more active and solid/good wins add up.

 

Isal will never give 3G or a 3G fan the benefit of any doubt. He has an odd and unnatural hatred of 3G and all his fans, due to his own love for Canelo. With some of these guys, you can tell a fighter doesn't have to have done anything to recieve their hatred. It's all immature "Choose a side" crap...

 

You think Rubio, Brook, and Vanes are top wins for a long time reigning MW champion like Golovkin? lol

That's all you need to know about GGG's resume.

 

Most long reigning champions have a lot of top contenders on their cv. You've been suckin cash cow dong for so long you are used to them targeting specific opponents. Most boxers face a string of top contenders moron. But of course, use your love for Oscar and Canelo to assume i'm wrong....

 

What a low IQ post. Surely you can do better than that Lance#2.

Rubio was a solid win maybe in his prime. Not at the end of his career, 6 losses in 4 by KO.
DL and MM are decent wins, B level dudes who will lose to A level fighters almost every time, on the level of Liam Smith. Cotto is a HoF and a PR ATG. Those two dudes are not.
Brook was a WW.. Goes to show you how weak GGGs resume is, that you have to include a WW as a top win. I included Khan because I listed ALL of Canelo's wins smart guy, I did not say he was a top win.
Vanes is another B level dude, but what made it worse is that he had been retired for 2 years sitting on his ass, was a Jr.MW, and only had about 4 weeks notice lol... Why do you think he didn't even last as long as other C level dudes in GGGs resume against a "slipping" GGG.

Come on man, don't argue for the sake of arguing, put something thoughtful together.

 

I have high expectations of fighters I pay money to watch.

A tune up here and there or even every other fight is okay, but when you're a champion and your resume consists of mostly tune ups and there are credible opponents calling you out, but you refuse to acknowledge, then as a paying fan I can criticize.

 

No, you have unrealistic expectations moron...based on you growing up only watching a cash cow get his every demand and his every fight wanted... You have no freakin clue about the average boxers. Hell dude, you grew up on a message board, ONLY looking for popular names of boxers. You joined when you were not even a teenager for christs sake!! Just a punk kid with waay too much hero worship.

You're just a cash cow loving casual fan, always were...

 

Lol.. You're funny dude. I'm probably older than you.

I know more about boxing than you, that's for sure. I'll gladly debate you on any topic, no insults, no sarcasm, no hyperbole.

What I do know is when a fighter is milking his fans. I like and follow a lot of boxers, obviously I have the ones I invest more time in, but if you're a top fighter and you avoid the most interesting fights possible I lose interest.

Both GGG and Mikey were fighters I rooted for at one time, but both have been let down imo.

 

Probably older than me? F*ck off little girl.... You joined as some pant-sh*tted 12yo newbie.... and you have no changed at all. Still suckin on that cash cow sausage...only thing that's changed is now it's Canelo, rather than Oscar.

Oh...you bandwagoned 3G and mikey once, then jumped off the bandwagons, because they didn't fight who you wanted.

Are you still a 12yo b*tch or something?

 

I find it rather odd that you insist on knowing my age.

You're still the same bitter hater you were 15 years ago Lance, and you still can't debate without getting emotional, and disrespectful.

Why does it get you so riled up if anyone is critical of GGG?

Its a shame GGG passed up so many opportunities to create a great legacy.

You're right about one thing, I was a big De La Hoya fan, an ATG, who took on all comers, no excuses, fought everyone worth fighting win or lose, high risk or low risk.

Same with Canelo, I was skeptical about him, but he won me as a big fan when he fought Lara, and he continues to fight the best.

I don't care much for fighters KO subpar opposition, I care about fighters competing against the best.

So to each their own. You love GGG because he has a great smile, and he KO no hopers, I like Canelo because he seeks the best challenges.