Both are alphabet champions with padded records. Who has a better resume? Valuev 50 - 2 John Ruiz Sergey Liakovitch Jameel Mcline Larry Donald old Holyfield Wilder 40-0-1 Stevern old Ortiz, old Liakovitch old Arreola
Wilder 1. Ortiz ( No.5 Ring Magazine, No.8 Boxrec ) 2. Stiverne ( No.2 Ring Magazine, No. 6 Boxrec ) 3. Draw w Fury ( No.2 Ring Magazine, No.3 Boxrec ) 4. Breazeale ( No.9 Boxrec ) 5. Several top 15 Guys ( Szpilka, Duhaupas, Washington, Scott ) 9 Title defenses, wins in 9 title bouts and 1 draw. Valuev 1. John Ruiz 2005 ( No.5 Ring Magazine, No.5 Boxrec ) 2. Liakhovich ( No.7 Ring Magazine ) 3. Ruiz 2008 ( No.9 Boxrec ) 4. Very old Holyfield 5. Jameel McCline Losses against Chagaev and Haye 4 title defenses, wins in 5 title bouts and 2 losses. Wilder‘s resume is better and he would destroy Valuev H2H.
Holyfield beat that big hairy Soviet Sasquatch and all of you know it. Your history revisionist ideology is no match for video footage. You hate Wilder so bad you just start lying for nothing. This forum doesn't get a bunch of new members you fools ,you are trying to impress each other with pure made up bull**** because you don't like a guy for no reason other than he is a winner. If Haye could stun that big bum then Wilder would put him on a stretcher. This content is protected This content is protected
Maybe wins a UD, but Valuev's chin and stamina are too good. Wilder is also a horrible boxer, who relies on power.
valuev has marignally better wins, and is probably not as good h2h, since wilder has been able to draw with fury as his best effort. very slim pickings though. marginal differences. They are both 2 of the worst champions we have seen.
Holyfield Valuev was nothing more then a glorified sparring session held in Switzerland. Nobody even tried to win.
Valuev beat a prime Holyfield and that's what the judges think, so there's no arguing. Don't try rewrite history now. I think you're just jealous of Valuev's luxurious winter coat
