(SMFH) 6 Scorecards And Only 1 Had GGG The Winner...

GGG won, even mexican Tv scored it for GGG

 

This. Anyone calling the second a robbery is ridiculously biased. I mean obviously there are some small exceptions. If you thought GGG won fine, robbed? No. You can't give me 7 clear GGG rounds.

 

Same. And the first was much closer.

 

What do you make of Dave Moretti?
He had the first fight 115-113 for Golovkin.
But he had the rematch 115-113 for Alvarez.

 

He lost to Canelo.

 

What you said was they are professional and know more. I gave you a small sample of the ineptitude of the judging. People have a right to be upset with poor decisions. They spend hard earned money to attend or view in their homes. What happened to everyone wanting the fights to be on an even playing field? That was a pretty popular sentiment just 5 years ago.

 

You're right about the rematch, but it sounds like you are still on the robbery bandwagon in regards to the first encounter. I'm going to ask you the same questions I asked CJ, to see how honest you are + one other question.

In Canelo GGG 1,

1) Who landed more power punches?
2) Who landed more body shots?
3) Who landed more clean eye-catching punches?
4) Who showcased better defense throughout the bout?

 

So basically, you are calling out all the things Canelo did ok with ?
are you the type of person who believes a jab doesnt count ? If so, Look at what GGG's Jab did to Lemiuex.

Golovkin Didnt just fight for 4 rounds, he fought all 12. Canelo on the other hand fought 4-5 rounds at most then waited on his gas tank to replenish. Whats very weird, you would of thought for a Lighter athlete (Yes he is a light athlete) who trains very consistently and often would be able to keep going for all 12 instead of gassing constantly.

 

Understand that I'm not using these facts to prove that Canelo won. But I'm trying to understand how something is a robbery when a fighter has more power punches, more body shots etc. Who won is certainly debatable, and you can make the argument GGG edged some of those close rounds with activity with Canelo not landing enough punches, but please explain to me how something is a robbery when Canelo didn't even get the win despite landing more power punches, body punches, etc things that more times than not go hand and hand with winning.

 

I already destroyed you in our debate about this. You don't get a runback.

 

When will you guys wise up?? Its not just the judges that are crooked, not just Fishnets & Canelo plus it wasnt just Mayweather before him. Who controls Vegas boxing??
The Nevada State Athletic Commission. They know exactly whats going on. Have they attempted to do anything about it ?? Roflmao Of course not They are where the corruption starts. Really the judges are just pawns & scapegoats they either score as instructed or they dont work any more plus they take the flak that should be directed at the State Commissions

 

That's not a valid answer. Landing more power punches, more body shots, more eye catching punches, making your opponment miss more generally go hand and hand with winning. I'm not arguing with you over who deserved to win, I'm asking you how it is a robbery (if you believe that) with a fighter landing more power punches and body shots for example. Canelo didn't even win despite doing that, GGG didn't lose his belts. Regardless of who you thought won I don't see how you can argue it was a robbery with Canelo clearly landing the more significant shots even if he was outlanded overall.

 

I already destroyed you. I'm not getting into a back and forth with someone who's going to make me read novels. You're the annoying fly that I already splatted on my wall, you don't get to come back to life.

 

Because a large majority of experts had GGG winning.
Canelo has been on the end of suspiciously favorable score cards before.
a 118-110 Score card for Canelo wreaks of bribery.

If you honestly cannot see why Canelo never loses on the cards to a lesser star, theres no help for you.
Money talks in boxing, its that simple.

 

I asked you 4 simple questions. You are ignoring answering them by saying you already destroyed me lol. That a clear deflection. You're being intellectually dishonest rude and arrogant.