There is a possibility that Crawford could hurt his hands from beating on Porter. Other than that, Porter has no chance.
Honestly, based off Porter's workrate, chin, and aggressiveness he is all wrong for Crawford. Crawford would have a better change against Thurman than he would Porter. Think Madonna vs Floyd times 10
I mean, we know Floyd has gone down the exhibition fight route but surely this is too left-field a match-up even for him?
Well, I would say crawford by ko. I dont see Porter going full survival mode at the end of the fight, hence, he will be koed.
Thurman hits way harder than Crawford and is much better at throwing with bad intentions. I highly doubt Crawford could ko Porter. It look him 12 rounds to KO jose.
Porter is a better boxer than Madianna was. Porter is basically a super Siyned version plus he has a much better chin. I don't see Crawford just outclassing Porter(Crawford is becomeing very overrated) Hell, I don't see Sugar Ray, Hearns, Manny, or Prime Floyd just outclassing Porter. Porter may be the most physical WW of all-time.
Porter will never be anybodys heavy bag work out. If he still fighting at 40 years old he’ll still be jumping around
What is your evidence that Thurman hits way harder? If Crawford's lack of fights at ww is all you got that's hardly proof of anything
Are we really about to sit here and try to make an aruguement that Crawford hits harder than Thurman. Thurman has a much higher ko percentage and he has actually rocked much better opposition compared to Crawford. Crawford stops everyone Crawford has fought and this is a gurantee.