The 80"S Heavyweight s ..Now ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Jun 27, 2019.


  1. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    30,309
    37,280
    Jan 8, 2017
    The so called "Lost "' generation but around now ?
    Wilder ,Fury ,AJ ,Ruiz ,etc mixing it up with Pinklon Thomas ,Tucker , Spoon , Weaver etc .
    Dangerous for the top name s or is today s generation a class above iyo ?
     
  2. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,183
    45,087
    Mar 3, 2019
    Nah mate, these guys are competitive today but I wouldn't say there elite but
    Where's the Berbicks, Shavers and Pages of these?

    They make today's division look like Honey G
     
    Fergy likes this.
  3. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    30,309
    37,280
    Jan 8, 2017
    Lol Honey G , that's a proper blow to the nuts !
    But I'm with you on that George .
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  4. ideafix12

    ideafix12 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,012
    864
    Jul 30, 2010
    Leaving Tyson Fury aside, the 80 heavyweights were better.
     
    lloydturnip likes this.
  5. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007

    The 1980's had two major problems. Drugs, and the IBF adding a third belt to fight for were primary. South African politics, and Don King made things difficult at times. Spoon motivated for a big fight, and Thomas off the drugs were better than what we have today, or at least would be in the top 4 today.
     
  6. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    27,172
    18,186
    Apr 3, 2012
    If you hand pick the best 80s heavyweights at their peak and plop them in the 2019 division, it looks favorable to the 80s. The issue is that year by year it was generally worse than now with the exception of Tyson and Holmes.

    If you take the best of the last ten years and put them in one top ten list, you've got Wlad, Vitali, Haye, juiced Povetkin, and Blond Ortiz thrown in the mix with Usyk, Wilder, Joshua, Ruiz, and Fury....That is a deep list.
     
  7. Rope-a-Dope

    Rope-a-Dope Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,138
    7,974
    Jan 20, 2015
    Time travel those guys from the 80s into now and they still be the same: underachieving and self destructive. We could all name a dozen guys who are as good or better than anyone now. But they were as good or better than anyone back then too and most of them managed to screw it up somehow.
     
    NoNeck and Sting like a bean like this.
  8. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    30,309
    37,280
    Jan 8, 2017
    A fit and serious Fury could probably beat ANY of the 80 S Heavyweight s ,I'm pretty sure . Apart from Holmes and maybe Tyson of course .AJ ,at the moment ,I see him losing to a few . Wilder would struggle against Witherspoon ,Tubbs , Thomas and Tucker .
     
    ideafix12 likes this.
  9. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,034
    Sep 5, 2004
    The 80s had a more talented line up than today.

    Tyson
    Holmes
    Witherspoon
    Tucker
    Thomas
    Page
    Dokes
    Weaver
    Smith
    Tubbs
    Berbick
    Williams


    Fury
    Wilder
    Joshua
    Ruiz
    Ortiz
    Pulev
    Whyte
    Povetkin
    Parker
    Kownacki
    Miller
    Joyce

    The current crop of heavyweights have improved from the past decade but at their respective bests I'd favor the 80s crop. To be fair these guys still have quite a bit of ground to cover so its entirely possible things can change.
     
  10. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,576
    82,073
    Aug 21, 2012
    You would have tofavour the 80's guys I think. Ortiz, Pulev and Povetkin are fine fighters but well past their sell-by date and are calcifying as we speak.
     
    George Crowcroft and Fergy like this.
  11. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    27,172
    18,186
    Apr 3, 2012
    See my post a few up.