Andrade is really sloppy

There's a gif doing the rounds on twitter showing him missing with an absolutely ludicrous haymaker that most amateurs would be embarrassed by.

The guy's a pretty boy who would rather stink a joint out and keep his hair looking good than risk getting punched in the face a few times.

 

He’s actually pretty good, but I want to see him fight ggg or Nelo , prolly gets starched but let’s see it maybe he can box ya know?

 

This content is protected

Trying so hard to be like Fury with the unorthodox angles.

 

Andrade is talented, I won't deny and I like half of what he does. The other half looks awful at times.

Watching him last night I honestly believe Saunders would embarrass him, Andrade is far too wild at times, far to keen to impress.

Looking at it from a different perspective.. would he box like that against Saunders? I'm not sure if I'm honest.


I understand Andrade wants to impress, do something spectacular to get noticed and create a buzz and become a bit of a "star" but I'd be far more impressed if he wasn't winging punches, missing and falling off balance.

When he actually settle and boxes what you'd call "text book" he looks very talented and a handful.

I think he needs a "big fight", Saunders, Golovkin, Canelo, somebody like that for us to see what he is really all about, to see if he can really compete with the top boys of the division.

I don't think we are going to see what he really can do until there is real danger in front of him and last night there wasn't so he took liberties and knew he could get away with some of that, he would know he couldn't get away with that sort of performance against any of the fighters I've mentioned.


So for me, I can't really judge him against the top lot until he actually fights one of them and we see what style he brings, what discipline he brings, what mentality he brings because against fringe top 10 fighters he knows he take do what he likes and his natural ability and natural athleticism will be more than enough.

 

That really weak opponent pushed Danny Jacobs all the way and beat Culcay more comprehensively than Derevyenchenko did.

 

I turned the fight off because his gloves didn't match the rest of his ring attire.

 

Fair assessment

I thought his defense was impressive but his offense needs work

Hes very slippery but telegraphed his left a lot. Though the wide left comes at an unusual angle

 

He was not facing a weak opponent he beat sulecki better than jacobs did who struggled against him.

 

is he going to punch himself in the face too?

 

What exactly does that mean? Pacquiao beat Cotto, Hatton and De La Hoya better than Floyd who struggled with Oscar and won via split decision.

 

Plenty no one called sulecki a weak opponent when Jacobs fought him. Also many posters here predicted him to beat Andrade. Lastly pbf didnt struggle with oscar he won that fight 9-3 or 8-4 at worst.

 

Not according to his daddy or the judges.

I thought Oscar won the fight on points, threw more punches and was more aggressive. My son had good defense and caught a lot of punches but Oscar pressed enough to win the fight.

 

Lmao... dude people were saying Andrade was going to get exposed, used how Sulecki gave Jacobs hell as a reason, and now they're completely doing an 180, and saying Sulecki sucks lmao and discrediting his opposition.

 

If you thought oscar won that fight then you dont know **** about boxing have angenda or both. Pbf made oscar miss landed the cleaner harder shots took away oscar's jab and watched him fade down the stretch on cue. It was a easy fight to score 9-3 was the most accurate 8-4 is also acceptable.