Was Muhammad Ali the fastest heavyweight of all time?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Jul 3, 2019.


  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,554
    May 4, 2017
    Bowe`s ability to slip punches was slow and he couldn`t cut the ring off plus he looked heavier v Hide than he did in the first fight v Holy, Bowe was able to land on Holy more because he threw more punches at Bowe while Hide was moving a lot.
     
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,554
    May 4, 2017
    Holmes movement looked clumsy though.
     
    Bronze Tiger and ribtickler68 like this.
  3. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    28,778
    34,991
    Jan 8, 2017
    Probably as well is the fact that we see a lot more of Ali , he's famous for his speed . Dokes never had the limelight on him as much .
     
    Bronze Tiger likes this.
  4. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,269
    9,108
    Jul 15, 2008
    He was likely the fastest excellent big man .. a few may have been faster w hands like Patterson but he was way at the top ... he was the fastest overall mover for sure ..
     
    Bronze Tiger likes this.
  5. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,566
    Jan 30, 2014
    What was scientific about the hand speed timing? And I know you've mentioned this a bunch in the past but this is the first time you claimed that Ali's jab was "MUCH" faster than Robinson's. Do you have any sources where we can read about this in more detail?
     
    Pat M likes this.
  6. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,497
    1,644
    Aug 18, 2012
    There are two videos on YouTube. One is of Jim Jacobs who was involved/initiated the testing and another of Ali describing the testing/results. From memory Ali’s jab was 2-3 times as quick as SRR jab. You would need to look for them yourself. All this is very well know history BTW.
     
  7. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,566
    Jan 30, 2014
    Has anyone else seen these videos or read detailed descriptions of the "scientific" test that Jacobs used here? The test and Jacobs' (alleged) conclusions sound like junk to me.
     
    Rock0052 likes this.
  8. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,497
    1,644
    Aug 18, 2012
    No. Well known boxing history. You should question your knowledge of the sport if you are not keenly aware of this.
     
  9. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,566
    Jan 30, 2014
    I know that Sports Illustrated timed a single Ali jab with an omegascope. I don't know anything about how Jacobs actually went about timing Robinson's jab. And I doubt you do either. I have no idea how Robinson would have performed in a similar testing condition. That makes the "scientific test" and your whole talking point suspect. So like I said, sounds like junk to me.
     
    Rock0052 and Pat M like this.
  10. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,372
    9,256
    Oct 22, 2015
    I'm with you on this , Ali's hand speed was superior to all heavyweights with the possible exception of M. Dokes, possibly J.Louis( And if were talking speed with power and technique, no one was close to J.Louis) Other than those two, no one else was close, and no heavyweight was even close to his foot speed and overall reflexes.
     
    Bronze Tiger, Cecil and Blaxx like this.
  11. META5

    META5 Active Member Full Member

    1,396
    2,115
    Jun 28, 2005
    Monte Cox has discussed this on his site.

    I believe, from memory, that Ali's jab was timed as being one third faster than SRR's jab. They measured the time that it took Ali's jab to get to full extension versus the time that it did so for SRR's on film. The clear flaw here for me is that a more apt comparison would have been versus prime welterweight speed SRR for a truer idea of how fast Ali's jab stacks up. I do qualify this with noting that even at MW, SRR was a speedy, fluid operator on film - Ali has no business throwing punches faster than a quick MW.

    I often ponder the conundrum of if Ali is the quickest, smoothest overall mover of established HW great fighters and Tyson for me is the most explosive over short distances on film, is Ali perceived as quicker because it's graceful and remniscent of Pep, Elorde, Robinson whilst stylistic preference makes Tyson take a backseat because he's coming forward ala how Duran doesn't get his dues for me for just how quick his speed was within his elite skillset?
     
  12. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,497
    1,644
    Aug 18, 2012
    Well stated META!
     
  13. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,497
    1,644
    Aug 18, 2012
    The test was run by one of the major film labs...Kodak?
     
  14. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,566
    Jan 30, 2014
    There are actually a ton of potential flaws, since we have no idea how Jacobs went about choosing a comparison SRR jab or how accurate his measurement approach was (sounds sketchier than the omegascope). I also have no idea how much variance to expect from pro punchers flicking a single punch at a target 16 inches away. Would have been cool if some other fighters had hit the same balsa board as Ali.

    We know that Ali had a very fast jab, but I don't know that these tests tell us anything beyond that. Too many unanswered questions for the Robinson comparison to be meaningful.
     
    Rock0052, Pat M and Bokaj like this.
  15. META5

    META5 Active Member Full Member

    1,396
    2,115
    Jun 28, 2005
    Agreed on many flaws apparent, not exactly the most scientific method.

    Anyone that's fought in the ring, sparred in training, shadowboxed and hit the speedbag knows that the perception of fast hands can change dramatically depending on whom the opponent is. It's like the punching balls at the arcade that measure power - all good and well until you actually hit a live opponent. Hitting a balsa board is very different from landing jabs versus a prime Tyson who moves extremely well.

    I'm fairly happy that overall reflex and speed, Ali and Tyson are the sharpest guys and p4p beasts in every sense of the word.