GGG for sure. And we can we stop with the resume thing, because if we take a closer look at Canelo resume, he have some shady, shady decision. Forget GGG, but he should have lost to Lara and Trout. And then his resume wouldn`t be that special, right ? But what to tell you, in one side beating Canelo manage to score a draw on one of the scorecards against Floyd.
Press row scores don’t they? I mean a lot of boxers thought pacquiao beat floyd initially. Loma thought pacquiao beat floyd luve then changed his opinion when he sat down to rewatch it. Point being, listing a bunch of people who dont have a scorecard isn’t helping your cause. It’s usually mayhem in the arena, you’re not paying as much attention.
No one can be more of a sheep than you. Sheep follow authority, just like you. Your arguments are..sheepish too, to say the least. Logical fallacy upon logical fallacy. Yet still the majority of pundits, fans, and boxing experts agree that GGG won both fights. Anyone with a half a brain can calculate the punches landed and the quality, sheep can't . Good bye ..or rather Good bahhhh.
Pundits and Boxing experts? Lol Only in GGGoonland. I'll give you the first fight. You can make a case GGG won that because the rounds seemed closer, but Canelo whooped him in the rematch. So much that he ran off stage, went into exile, and took almost an entire year off only to fight someone no one had ever heard of for his comeback.
If GGG was the Mexican and Canelo the Kazakh then it’s 2 wins in the bag for GGG with no draw whatsoever. Instead Canelo failed 2 PED tests delaying the rematch then a year later from the first fight GGG showed he’s still better than him at age 36.
You're an idiot so Im not engaging you, i just wanted to use your post to make a point. Scoring a boxing match is not some challenging intellectual exercise that only an elite minority have the gifted insight to do correctly. The percieved hardcore and the casual typically can agree on who won a fight, while extreme distorted bias and delusions of grandeur as demonstrated by isal is just a vocal minority. I believe had Golovkin been awarded the first bout 8 rounds to 4 there would have been no sigificant outrage or call for a rematch.
Much like the majority, I believe Golovkin won 8 to 4 or 7 to 5 in the rematch. You are also a troll. So your card wouldnt surprise me anymore than a confession that you dont actually watch boxing.
Canelo landed more power punches in both fights. Golovkin landed more punches overall and jabs in both fights. Canelo showed better defense in both fights. Golovkin missed more punches in both fights. Canelo seemed dictate the tempo of the fight in rounds 1-3 and 10-12 in the first fight. Golovkin seemed to dictate the tempo of the fight in roounds 4-9 in the first fight. Canelo had GGG fighting off the back foot in the rematch. So you're telling me, based on that information it should be easy to score? GTFO. They were both close fights and you can watch the fights multiple times and possibly have different scores every time. I can accept someone scoring it for GGG, why can I do that, because I'm not an unreasonable fanboy as you seem to be, I actually put boxing above any fighter, and I admit and accept that both fights were close. The very fact that you make this debate personal by trying to insult me tells me you're an insecure hater.
Canelo is the better “boxer”. Golovkin has that relentless pressure and iron chin as well as great boxing too.
yes majority of your mind thinks it, thats why you had to reach for that "rest of majority" but he lost.
You should know You Ginger lovers are livid because GGG is rated Wayyyyyyyy above Ginger by boxing experts