Herbie Hide vs Tommy Morrison in ´94

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by unitas, Jul 14, 2019.

  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2017
    Messages:
    36,653
    Likes Received:
    16,584
    Morrison was very easy to hit.
     
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2017
    Messages:
    36,653
    Likes Received:
    16,584
    Louis was harder to hit than Morrison though that`s the difference.
     
  3. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2017
    Messages:
    32,461
    Likes Received:
    40,658
    A shock win here from Hide .. Catching Morrison early and stopping him in 2 round s !
     
  4. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    66,857
    Likes Received:
    87,888
    No, actually he wasn't so easy to hit as you suppose.
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    72,005
    Likes Received:
    28,033
    Setting my objections aside, which version of Morrison turns up?

    Morrison was a model of bad preparation for fights.

    He had better not turn up to this fight in poor condition, because Hide would not!
     
  6. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2008
    Messages:
    8,750
    Likes Received:
    3,447
    If the bout is held in Norwich, Herbie gets rid of him quick. If the bout is in America, I like Morrison. I sure do not think either was any sort of road warrior and capable of going in the lion's den for a win.

    The bout was on that China card that Arum cancelled because it was not going to make money. I had a lot on Hide because there is no way Morrison was training hard in China and lets say, without distractions. He would have been doing everything except preparing for a fight.
     
  7. unitas

    unitas Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,062
    Likes Received:
    768
    lets just assume the morrison of the Foreman fight.
     
  8. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    58,747
    Likes Received:
    21,593
    Lots of excuses for Morrison.
    He didn't lose to Michael Bentt because of "bad preparation". He lost because he went for the kill and got caught. His chin couldn't handle it.
    Bentt was a good fighter, I'd followed him since the amateurs.
    Morrison's reputation is built on old washed-up men.
    But he didn't have much of a reputation in the 1990s anyway. He was considered a second-rater at best, but an attractive box office fighter.
    I don't know why he gets rated so much higher now ... I guess a combination of nostalgia and his tragic career and death.

    Hide-Morrison is almost 50-50 because Hide's chin was possibly even more dismal than Morrison's. But Hide probably has the edge with his speed and his footwork. Either way, this doesn't last long.
     
    NoNeck likes this.
  9. On The Money

    On The Money Dangerous Journeyman Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2012
    Messages:
    29,548
    Likes Received:
    14,153
    Hide did to Bentt what Morrison probably thought he'd do to him, although I still think Hide Morrison would have been a close fight.
     
  10. JamesFosterGB

    JamesFosterGB New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2019
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    65
    If Morrison fought Hide like he fought Foreman he wins. That night he fought as an outboxer. He was cautious, stayed behind his jab and didn't get into range for Foreman to land one of his sledgehammer clubbing blows.
    If he fought like he did against Bentt as a slugger Hide had the speed, enough power to cause an upset.
     
  11. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    29,793
    Likes Received:
    20,239
    But Hide had quicker hands and feet than Morrison whereas Foreman was a walking mummy.
     
  12. dawnofthedead

    dawnofthedead Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2014
    Messages:
    371
    Likes Received:
    151
    We know the script, both had weak chins though Morrison would often rise from the canvas to win & i would pick him to stop Hide after a few early scares, Hide could punch but had no chin, Klitschko knocked him unconscious with a jab & i believe Morrison would have stopped him.
     
    Stiches Yarn likes this.
  13. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2022
    Messages:
    17,829
    Likes Received:
    38,702
    Two glass cannons with a big punch anything could happen, but I'd pick a fully motivated more proven Heavyweight Tommy Morrison by KO in under 6 rounds.
     
  14. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    52,274
    Likes Received:
    27,853
    Both men had the power to stop the other. Both early starters with fast hands. Neither were terribly durable. I’d say it just depends who gets in trouble first. Probably a good fight though
     
  15. Bigcheese

    Bigcheese Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2015
    Messages:
    2,020
    Likes Received:
    2,662
    Forgetting the Bentt fight, Morrison went lots of rounds with Mercer, Lewis, and Ruddock where he ate some pretty heavy shots. I think he would stop Hide early more often than not.