Foreman vs Wilder: Who is better

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Jul 21, 2019.


Who's better

  1. Prime Foreman

    44 vote(s)
    88.0%
  2. Prime Wilder

    6 vote(s)
    12.0%
  1. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,579
    May 30, 2019
    Nobody is talking about old George here. Young Foreman would be faster and quicker than most opponents Wilder fought. Definitely quicker than Ortiz or Silvestern.
     
  2. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,634
    May 13, 2014
    No.
    Ortiz https://i.imgur.com/7nxdbWX.mp4
    Foreman https://i.imgur.com/3a2TbcD.mp4

    Pretty clear speed advantage in Ortiz favor. At least to my eye, but I can give tons more examples if you like.
     
    Pat M likes this.
  3. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,634
    May 13, 2014
    Hilariously enough I've just been playing Devil's advocate for Wilder. Think Foreman cuts off the ring and body punches the **** out of him. But WIlder would be a very live underdog with his length and power. Wilder might win 3 or 4 out of 10.
     
  4. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,579
    May 30, 2019
    I'd like to see examples that are alike. In Ortiz clip, he threw some jabs and did quick combination to the body against taller opponent. Foreman threw powerful uppercuts on smaller opponent.

    Completely different situations and Ortiz doesn't really look fast in that exchange.
     
    KeedCubano and escudo like this.
  5. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,634
    May 13, 2014
    Brb.
     
    70sFan865 likes this.
  6. VVMM

    VVMM Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,372
    344
    Nov 16, 2012
    Don't forget Wilders' poor workrate and questionable chin ! The height is an overrated factor in boxing -I think your ideal sport is the boring basketball.- like the fat Ruiz proved last time.
    All in all Foreman would destroy Wilders' thin and fragile body.
     
  7. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,579
    May 30, 2019
    In the first clip Ortiz showed nice, decent movement for his size and one quick attack.
    In the second clip there is nothing worthy of talking as far as speed comes.
    In the third clip Ortiz looks sloppy and he's not fast at all.
    In the fourth clip Ortiz threw some decently fast body punches (nothing Foreman wasn't able to do) but other than that, nothing special.
    In the last clip Ortiz threw quick right hand, all of the rest he threw were not fast by any standards.

    In the first clip Foreman wasn't fast at all, but he basically only threw jabs to establish his range.
    In the second clip Foreman threw quite quick uppercut at the beginning, the rest of the punches are slow but very powerful.
    In the third clip Foreman's first combo was quite fast and he hurt Norton with it. The rest (including 4th clip) is just a finishing badly hurt fighter, so Foreman used slow but powerful punches.


    Nothing here suggest me that Ortiz is much faster than young Foreman.
     
  8. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,579
    May 30, 2019
    Another thing is that Wilder has very low workrate, that could be a huge disadvantage against Foreman. George would cut him off the ring and Wilder wouldn't find a place to hide. He didn't have Ali's jab or clinching tactics to bother Foreman and he didn't have as durable body as Ali - another huge reason why Ali won.
     
    KeedCubano likes this.
  9. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,634
    May 13, 2014
    You said Foreman would be the quickest fighter Wilder faced. I disagree, Ortiz had quicker hands and feet. Foreman threw with everything he had often. Ortiz punched for speed and moved more fluidly than young George.
     
  10. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,579
    May 30, 2019
    I said that Foreman would be quicker opponent than Ortiz, not the quickest in his career. I still stand that Foreman was quicker fighter especially in terms of feet. Watch some fights of younger Foreman, he didn't always use slow footwork.
     
  11. TipNom

    TipNom Active Member Full Member

    1,466
    3,021
    Jun 19, 2019
    If you think Wilder is slow then you haven't seen any of his fights. If Wilder is slow George Foreman is a statue. Foreman rarely got hit in his prime because he was bigger than most of his opponents which meant he can shove them out of range. But Wilder is 6'7 so his lean back style would work against Foreman.
    Wilder only throws off balance hurts his opponent. His technique was horrendous but he's improved it recently.
    Wilder fought Duhaupus in 2015 and Szpilka in 2016 he's improved since then and they were both faster than Foreman.
    George Foreman isn't Tyson Fury he's smaller and slower than him he couldn't do to Wilder what Fury did to him.
     
    Pat M likes this.
  12. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Wilder would be too quick for the older Foreman who wouldn`t have laid a glove on Fury, Frazier too far gone in his rematch v Foreman and fought a stupid fight, if he backed off like that v Wilder he would have been destroyed.
     
    Pat M and TipNom like this.
  13. TipNom

    TipNom Active Member Full Member

    1,466
    3,021
    Jun 19, 2019
    Foreman's work rate wasn't great either.
    Wilder took several big punches from Ortiz and didn't go down. Height isn't everything in boxing but if you know how to use it, it gives you an advantage over most opponents.
     
    escudo and Pat M like this.
  14. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    Of the two guys that took Wilder the distance, one of them (Stiverne) was shorter than Foreman.
     
    KeedCubano, escudo and 70sFan865 like this.