Pacquiao-Bradley III Had VADA Testing; Bradley Was Dominated, Hurt, And Dropped 2X...

I couldn't care less. The PED thing with Manny is just the jealousy of the idiot FlIVd nut huggers because they cant stand Manny has a superior legacy that he built on his own through legitimately daring to challenge himself and be great.

 

• Maidana-Broner had no VADA-testing - Who do you think may have been doping here? Both?
• Broner stood and traded w/ the much bigger Maidana - A more confident guy yet to lose, not surprise there. He was also criticised afterwards for trading so prob thought tactically this would be stupid to repeat if he felt he was the 'better' boxer.
• Broner walked down and had Maidana out on his feet in the 12th - Stop lying you chump, it's embarrassing.

• Pacquiao-Broner had VADA-testing - so you haven't heard of cycling before testing starts? And assume no-one has ever beaten VADA testing? OK...
• Broner never stood and traded w/ the much smaller and much older Pac - different tactics for different fighters in addition to factors mentioned above.
• Broner ran for survival and was staring down the clock - he claimed he thought he was winning in the immediate aftermath and was just seeing out the fight thinking that it would be silly to take a chance when he had it in the bag as it was. He's arguably a dumb as you for thinking this.

Had enough? I really wanted to avoid highlighting how stupid you were being but you had to push it.

 

Pretty much my POV. I would add: this comparison of a boxer's performance in fights which were and were not tested gives the impression the benefits of PEDs are like a light switch: on or off. The truth is studies show there are residual benefits for athletes who doped and then stopped, sometimes for years later. So it's a mute point. If a boxer took PEDs for an extended period of time (not talking Manny here, but generally) they have a boost irrespective of whether they subsequently stopped. Less of a boost than continuing, obviously. But a boost nonetheless....

 

What part of Broner was unbeaten and desperately trying to cling on to his 0 anyway he could having not planned to have any trouble with Maidana - he was 1-5 on to win - don't you understand? I've explained it to you as simply as I can and know you know what I mean but you blind man love for Manny and embarrassment about taking such an avoidable shellacking here won't let you admit it. You lied about Maidana being out on his feet, that was an absolute shocker and totally unforced error on your part. Why you keep repeating it when it makes you look more of a fool each time only you know.

If Chino fought the version of Broner Pac fought, then no way AB tries to fight him the same way.

 

Yep but don't say it too loudly as we don't want Android's laptop getting water damaged from all of the tears.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/29510575

 

I guess maintaining muscle mass is easier than building it. I think that was the article I'd read tbh. Gatlin would have made a great LHW. And as for Bolt, he'd clean up CW. Blinding speed....

 

I thought Bradley looked sharp. Pac just stepped his game up that night. If that Pac was still around, Thurman would have been stopped over the weekend.

 

What part of HE WAS UNBEATEN AT THE TIME AND THOUGHT HE WAS DESTINED FOR THE BIG TIME SO DESPERATE can't you get through your thick skull?

Pac fought a mentally shot Broner softened up by Chino and you get your panties in a bunch if anyone doesn't think it's some sort of weird proof he's never taken PEDs. Get a ****ing grip you weirdo. You've had everything explained to you but your crush on Manny won't allow you to admit it.

Then there's that fighters cycle on and off PED's and the benefits of this potentially lasting YEARS and you not wanting to know.

 

Unravelling? It's the same point you don't seem to be able to get. Broner found out his limitations against Maidana. He was meant to be the new Floyd going in and got spanked around the ring in a fight he claimed he was going to be coming out and showing his abilities. Styles make fights and he got it badly wrong. You know he'd try to fight Maidana differently further along in his career, don't keep playing dumb to this.

Don't keep playing dumb to PEDs being able to be cycled.

And I'm on record as praising Pac quite a bit so way to grasp at those last few straws man. I even said that if he is on drugs he's still doing things no over active 40 year old could do even if they were roided to the gills.

 

Well if Mayweather was still fighting that might be a bit more relevant and unfortunately for you I actually stared a thread asking who people believe in red flag situations such as IV gate this very evening before you wrote the above nonsense. JMM isn't mentioned as much here but his links with Heredia and acne in his 30s are def suspicious. You calling him Roidquez despite him not failing a test just like your criticise anyone who doubts Pac is also very hypocritical.

 

Thinking Manny Pacquiao's unnatural ability to be fighting at the top level aged 40 is suspicious isn't an especially out there opinion. I've also said I had doubts about Federer and Nadal and a host of other athletes