Who has he beaten exactly to earn that title? I mean he supposedly ''dominated' Wilder from bell to bell, but still had to scrape himself up off the canvas late in the fight to barely hold on for the D. Besides that, who has Fury really beaten? Usyk is just a clout chaser
Who has beaten? Wlad Klitschko and dominated Wilder...is irrilevant? Besides his boxing is improving month by month... he only has to perfect the power in his hand...
Depends what your criterion is, if it's fighting bums like Schwarz, and avoiding real contenders like Dillian Whyte, then I can't respect your life choices. I am not saying Dillian is the best, but he has the best attitude. And that's what makes a REAL champion. All the top guys have equal flaws, and any of them can lose to each other on any given night, in equal measure. So propping up one of them above the other as if it is head and shoulders, is ridiculous fanboyism. So far, Fury is proving himself to be a dosser, signing to ESPN, being a slave to the money and the contractual terms and fighting shoddy opposition till he retires. Meanwhile Whyte is taking on the best that is available, because the champions are making themselves hard to reach.
Your list is innacurate, Whyte has a better chin than you make out to be, Whyte has better defense than AJ, you should have gone to specsavers. And David Price hits harder than Whyte? OK cool, can I see some of them knockouts?
David Price hits more less like Wilder...said by Whyte in a recent interview (find on google) or watch Price's knockouts on Youtube. Price's trouble is that he has a glass chin (see vs Povetkin and others) with a better chin he could compete at the same level of Wilder who instead has a very good one! About the best defence of Whyte maximum is at the same level of AJ.
That's all well and good, but Whyte has displayed more power in the ring than Price, the highlight reels of present have Whyte's name stamped all over them. AJ get's hit very easy, Dillian has made significant improvements to his defence, and it comfortable better than AJ's.
You’re right depends on the question. I took it to mean - ‘which heavyweight do you think has most chance of beating all the others’ which is what a ‘who is the best’ question essentially boils down to. Avoiding all the arguments about politics and who is fighting who - in my opinion that’s Fury at the moment.
AJ hits strong like Ortiz, Whyte, Miller and Dubois...Wilder is an hard puncher like Foreman, Shavers, Tyson, Tua, Duran, Julian Jackson and others.
So who wins the rematch with Fury? I think if Fury loses it by knockout, he is pretty much done. What will he have left? Some crappy fighters on ESPN to showcase...
It's funny that you think Miller hits that hard, he is a ***** compared to Whyte, AJ, Dubois,,, doesn't belong in the same bracket. What is your obsession with Miller? We are not supposed to be speaking about that disgrace to humanity, and boxing. Please show some respect and avoid giving Miller air time and popularity... he is a bum.
I think Fury will win, but that's just my opinion. I think if he loses they may well draw out a 3rd fight because the first one was contentious. Who do you think is the best then? If the question is simply "which heavyweight do you think has most chance of beating all the others"? By that answer, are you saying Wilder?
Ok, maybe Miller can represent a disgrace for boxing for many but are you sure is the only one? In the last years many important names have been caught with the fingers in the cookie jar ...so what? During an interview great IronMike admitted he often fought under the effects of cocaine... the phenomenon of doping in all the professional sports is so much widespread that to think only Miller is doped is ridiculous.