How about banning a poster who says the same every single time in threads that don't interest him at all? I mean, calling Louis slow fighter is the next level of trolling. I've been thinking about ending my adventure with this forum, I thought the level of discussion here is much higher. Boxing is probably not the best sport for wise discussions though...
We should have an ELITE classic boxing forum where amateurs such as Pat and “green lantern” are not allowed to venture.
No what need is people like you to be flat out banned. If you so stupid that you can't understand that boxing has evolve over the years then you shouldn't be watching boxing. If you are too stupid to realize Joe Louis being good for 1930's standards doesn't equate to being good for modern standards. If you can't understand Joe Louis beating unskilled guys like Buddy and Max Baer, Primo Canera, Abe Simon doesn't equate to being able to beat modern skilled guys then you should just leave this forum yourself. Change your adult diaper and go back to talking about how back in your day you used to walk 100 miles to school or something. That would be more up to your speed.
Why don't you and Pat just set up a forum to discuss boxing on your own then? The end result would be the same as banning everybody who posts threads like this!
If you cannot see that Louis is far advanced in comparison to today large unskilled hwts then you need another sport to follow. It’s not close. Combination punching alone Louis cannot be touched and that’s a very obvious difference. It’s all the nuance skills of slipping, parrying, blocking, countering, feinting where Louis is a master and today’s hwts do not have a clue.
That's a great idea. You should go out and start up your own ELITE forum ASAP. Maybe the mods can give you some pointers? You'll be missed here but it's probably for the best.
Cute do you miss being ignored for trying to be a troll looking for attention. Good because you are ignored. Now go back to typing about how Italian tomato can Marciano "The Bum" Marciano could beat Mike Tyson and George Foreman.
Lol right then you realize Joe Louis wasn't. He looked skilled for that era because of the low level of skill everybody else had. Yeah Joe Louis could land combination punches on big slow lumbering oafs like Buddy Baer. So clearly that means he was skilled by modern level right? It is like saying because a sports car was considered state of the art for the 1930's standards so that means it would be considered state of the art by current standards. Joe Louis and his opposition skills were so bad I will honestly say Ronda Rousey had better boxing abilities than they had. Just stop watching boxing. People like you are a embarrassment to the sport.
Fair point. Spinks had an awkwardness that helped make him effective. At first glance I thought Southpaw stance of Moorer, along with a good right jab would trouble Louis. Heavyweights don't see along of lefties. At the same time Joe would drop that laser straight right and Moorer probably doesn't get up.
Green and Pat are completely clueless. My wife knows more about the sport of boxing than both of them combined.
Fine to make that case, But it is infantile, anonymous abuse to call an who differ stupid and mock them, like talking abut adult diapers. Go to a local bar or boxing gym, try that, and when you recover consciousness tell us how it went. But I see you do it again here, I am gonna personally ask you be banned. [url]T[/url]he Hate Speech undermines any valid case you might make, and also hurts our forum.