Dillian Whyte PED Discussion: Guilty? Not Guilty? Who Cares?

Your man is a two time drug cheat, but you think it's okay to give him the benefit of the doubt. You bang on about PEDs being a massive problem in the US and imply Pacman is on PEDs but then when you have a two time cheater who 100% had steroids in his system you think it's fine to hide behind the BBBOC and UKAD. Classy Eddie. Real classy.

 

He did. Hearn said some waffle about not wanting to risk hurting Rivas psychologically with that info. Very odd answer.

 

I've been saying for years on this forum that Eddie Hearn is a crook and the worst thing that has happened to boxing for a long time and for years people have been tearing into me accusing me of bias, jealousy and all kinds of other nonsense. And I'm sure that the OP is one of them.

It's good to see that people here are opening their eyes now.

 

This is Dianabolical..........

 

Yeah that would be interesting.

 

Dillianabol Whyte.

Although I still prefer the classic British forum moniker "Dullian 'the pudding' Shyte".

 

Yeah let's crucify Hearn who wasn't involved in the slightest, and ignore the Britsh Boxing Board of Control and UKAD clearing the fight on the same day as the fight.

Erm, sure why not.

 

I'll get back to you in a bit. Need to retrace it on twitter since I read it this morning.

 

This.

 

Oscar Rivas the Victory and Banning Cheater Whyte for six Months + Ranking Whyte Down.

 

lol! So he thinks Rivas would prefer to be hurt physically rather than psychologically? Massive, massive BS....

 

Was a very strange answer - one he'd clearly prepared for but came out sounding bizarre.

 

Hearn wasn't involved? Yes he was. He knew about the adverse findings and did nothing, allowed the fight to go on and chose not to tell the Rivas camp. The fact Whyte was 'cleared to fight' doesn't mean the fight had to happen.

Choosing to do nothing does not translate to not being involved. It seems to me he was hoping this would play out exactly like it did with Fury, with the case coming to light well after the fight and when the implications were diluted enough for their impact to be minimal.

Trouble is, someone else decided to break the silence. But no way can you claim he wasn't involved once the authorities made it clear they were hamstrung by their own protocol and couldn't act. That makes it even more Hean's responsibility. UKAD and the BBBoC couldn't do anything but Hearn could. He chose not to.

Oh, and don't think Eddie would bat an eye if he has to use Dillian as the fall guy. Your stance might be very different if it plays out that way....

 

In other words, it's ****n bull****, professionals in that position can't afford to be that sloppy, they would b ****ing anal about what they are ingesting. By doing the vada bluff thing they will always have an excuse that sounds logical, which is "why would he pay for vada and then go take riots", reverse psychology. **** the cheat off!

 

Good catch.