Dillian Whyte PED Discussion: Guilty? Not Guilty? Who Cares?

Please show us.

 

No point in it. This is UKAD. They could have asked VADA directly when they notified them that Whyte returned two adverse findings. But oh, UKAD couldn't bother to notify anyone except Hearn. Hmm...

Like in reality UKAD and VADA are supposed to be same same on same team, same side. smh

 

Apparently so the conspiracy theorists go, Whyte was done for 18 types of PEDs, wearing 2-ounce gloves, cyber kinetic skynet boxing shorts, and ACME springs in his shoes. Darn diddly cheat he must be going 5 years negative on 24/7 drug testing with 2 different drug agencies then magically somehow positive 3 days before becoming mandatory whilst fighting a midget penguin.

 

Ok then why didn't UKAD notify the WBC if they were whoooo scary... conspiring against Whyte for Wilder? Why was Whyte allowed to continue fighting? Who EXACTLY benefits from a dirty Whyte continuing on with the PPV. You realize that PPV = monies yea?

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/b...aks-silence-testing-positive-banned-drug.html

'I am so disappointed with the rubbish that has been said': Dillian Whyte breaks his silence after 'testing positive for banned drug' - and claims he beat Oscar Rivas 'fair and square'

Not sure Whyte knows what's fair and what's square lmao. How could he even say that when he was just at a trial for his adverse analytical finding for two metabolites of Dbol?

 

Oh ok, you think I am denying it?

According to Hauser's MEDIA article, UKAD found tiny amounts of Dianbol metabolites. During the same period, VADA found nothing.

This is due to the thresholds that UKAD and VADA implement as part of their testing methodology, the accredited labs return results that are flagged if they breach thresholds defined by the anti-doping agency.

However, at the Hearing, the panel of experts and professionals felt that it was important to obtain the records of all VADA testing to aid in their investigation. They since awarded Whyte the go ahead for the sanctioned bout.

In other media reports, thesmokinggm was found to be hovering outside UKAD trying to apply for a job, he mentioned on his CV that he spent near a decade watching the likes of Lance Amstrong, and that he was qualified enough to take part in the investigations.

 

Yep and they cleared Whyte and Rivas to fight.

 

Again that has nothing to do with nothing. You keep shading and whining about VADA. UKAD busted your boy. Deal with it with the UK peeps.

 

That's what I don't get. The last time he got popped it was for a bloody energy drink. This seems way more serious.

 

Whyte vs Fury for the PED HW championship of the world.

 

I thought Whyte wasn't signed up for vada 365

 

Yes a media report suggests that UKAD detected tiny amounts of dianbol metabolites for Whyte's doping tests. Is there anything else you want to talk about?

 

Why would UKAD do that to your Brit loverboy????

 

Hearn to ESPN: "As for why Rivas and his team were not informed of Whyte's test result, Hearn said, 'UKAD cleared him to fight. When a fighter is cleared to fight by a testing agency how do you then go to (Rivas) and say, "Just to let you know there was an issue with a drugs test but that's all been cleared up now."'"

Well, yes, Eddie, that's exactly what you were ethically obligated to do. Note that the board did not clear him of the test results (obviously not); it merely allowed him to fight because a confirmed result had not yet been posted. This is a horrible Board policy, and beyond that the promoter had a duty to the opponent to apprise him of the situation.

Rivas should have been alerted and decided for himself whether to proceed. He's the one who took the risk of fighting a potentially/likely juiced opponent, and here you have Hearn saying it was a trivial matter.

 

Do what? Detect the metabolites? Because they are an anti-doping agency, and Whyte is designated as a candidate for testing.