Oleksander Usyk vs the Rock from Brocton

Do you have any arguments about boxing to offer, as opposed to insults to people who disagree with you?

If not, then you are no use to us, and we are probably no use to you!

In that scenario, make a life elsewhere!

 

Keep lying Seamust. You are as porous as a sponge but not quite as intelligent.

 

You've accused this man ,now the onus is on you to produce the quote you say he made.
Put Up Or Shut Up! Don't take too long, lets have it before you are banned again!

 

Usyk would beat Marciano so bad that Marciano would of took his butt back Italy and retired. If Usyk had no legs or arms I would still pick him to stop caveman Marciano in a few rounds. The only way I could say Marciano winning is if Usyk was dead but then that fight would still be a toss up.

 

We've reached Peak General Forum.

 

All jokes aside, I think you’re confused. Maybe it was a dream?

 

What a weird thing to dream about

 

You should read about his treadmill dream!

 

Do I want to?

 

This ******ed attention seeker really needs to go for good.Can a Mod send a pm to his Mummy asking for him to be kept away from her computer?

 

Can’t wait to see the splash Pat M’s fighters make as punchers with his expert tutelage since he’s id’d where Marciano (with an 88% KO ratio) falls short as a puncher.

I’ve a feeling they won’t have either the success or visual evidence of their punching prowess that Rocky does but I stand to be corrected.

Give us some of the names of your fighters if you would Pat. I can’t wait to see the highlights of these expertly trained KO machines whose efforts shame the likes of Rocky Marciano or “Little” George Foreman.

 

As I remarked earlier ,it's very possible we will never see Usyk," behind ,cut and hurt," in a fight.That would be to his credit imo.
Marciano was floored by an ex lhvy 188lbs, a guy 38 /40 years old, and a 38years old heavyweight who was in front at the time of the stoppage,It is to his credit that he overcame these hurdles to ultimately prevail,but is it more meritorious than winning without ever being in that perilous position?
As far as untested and 16 fights goes;This month's Ring has the following in their P4P top ten list.
1.Lomachenko13-1-0
4.Inoue 18-0-0
5.Usyk 16-0-0
Something to think about?
I'm not making a pick just trying to present one side of the coin.
NB It was not Seamus who said Kovalev would beat those named fighters ,it was another poster who still posts regularly here.Given Seamus was accused of it I should have thought he might have owned up , but he hasn't, and I won't give his name,suffice to say it was NOT Seamus!

 

Calling Moore ex lhy 40 years old guy is completely lack of context. Archie was the best contender available for Marciano, he was great puncher even at HW and he was almost at his best (he peaked in 1951-54 in my opinion).

Not all 38 years old fighters are washed up. Fitzsimmons had one of his better efforts at that age.

 

He was an ex lhvy 38/40 years old Yes or No? I didn't say he was washed up.
Yes he was the best contender available, does that in any way change the first statement?
Moore was a great puncher at lightheavyweight,not at heavy imo.His ko record has a lot of "bodies ,"on it.
Moore himself said his legs were gone when he fought Marciano.I guess he should know when he was prime.
Fitzsimmons said his hands were ****ed by that time.

 

Even his figures are off. Sometimes by a lot.
Intellectually dishonest, or too lazy and/or biased to look up the actual fight weights.