Dillian Whyte tests positive for banned substance

Just to let you know - the black font doesn't show up on the black background. I recommend changing it to white because otherwise people might miss your post

 

I ALMOST fell for that. Oh wait, I am using a different website theme, jeez.

Thanks man

 

Nobody said they were getting paid off. However, I don’t doubt that these people are made fully aware of the implications of pulling the fight. For example, if UKAD were to be sued for suspending Whyte from sample A and Sample B turned out to be somehow miraculously clear. They can’t afford to be coughing up millions. They don’t have the financial clout to make the right decision.

Matchroom are absolute s***houses for not informing Rivas, and also about the gloves. That’s morally corrupt. If Rivas got hurt his insurance wouldn’t have covered him because it was known he failed a drugs test.

 

Then that is not corruption, and instead a problem with UK law, policies etc...

But to imply that all these stakeholders I mentioned would be embroiled in a cover up, or some type of corruption is outlandish beyond belief.

Everyone take a minute to reflect on the professionals that form that panel, these ain't muppets, and they ain't all regulars on the panel either.

 

Whyte had an NADP hearing, and "It is sometimes possible to accelerate proceedings and hold a hearing sooner if the matter is urgent. "

Same day urgent, you say HOW could UKAD have cleared it YADDA YADDA,

Go read up on who forms the INDEPENDENT NADP panel, a **** tonne of people, PROFESSIONALS, highly ranked. Barristers for crying out loud.

 

Withholding the truth from Rivas is corrupt.

 

Yeah but who is liable for that? And what law has it broken?

 

Just to add, justify to me @Aydamn why it was not corrupt to not tell Rivas?

I would say it was for fear of Rivas pulling out of the fight and the financial implications of that because Rivas would have been fully justified in doing so and being installed as Wilder’s mandatory.

CORRUPT!!!!!

 

What i cant get my head around is why the B sample test was not carried out with 36 hours left?
No requests just do it and go from there
Everyone in this scenario is looking awful bar the guy who actually looks like he is roids

 

They could have requested the result of sample B before the fight. Once again, corruption.

 

Twentyman this is spot on my friend

 

Not only that, but as you pointed out previously, had this Hauser article not leaked then you know damn well that none of this would have come out at all. The fact that there isn't a statement about the A sample from any of them is damning in itself.

 

Thanks mate. @Aydamn has been telling people that Rivas wouldn’t have pulled out anyway....why wouldn’t he, I know I would. I’d be compensated and installed as mandatory for Wilder and I wouldn’t have to get punched in the head by a sted head.

 

Its impossible to know as he was never given the chance to
Ive read the posts you mention and dont agree with them in the slightest

 

As noted on a youtube vid earlier, As per the rules Hearn could have rightly gone to the Rivas team and said "Ok, this has happened, here are the facts as we know them. We had a meeting with x, y or z and he is cleared to fight".

And if Rivas had pulled out (maybe he would, maybe not), then he would have been in breach of contract, which then becomes an absurd situation.