Dillian Whyte tests positive for banned substance

HE. HAS. FAILED. A. DOPING. TEST. FOR. PERFORMANCE. ENHANCING. DRUGS.

 

I’m not defending him. I think he’s in the wrong.

However!

Did he actually fail the test? That word hasn’t been used once. “Tested positive” has been used. But I think to the letter of the law it’s worded so that he hasn’t failed.

 

It's a better mistake than, a random civilian said.

 

I wish someone would leak the original statement Hearn had ready to go before " The miracle of all miracles " occurred.

The miracle of all miracles , the only time I have witnessed one of those in a legal setting was when I watched O.J Simpson trying on the glove.

 

AND. THEN. AS. PER. UKAD. RESULTS MANAGEMENT. PROCESS. IT. WENT. TO. AN. INDEPENDENT. HEARING. THAT. CLEARED. WHYTE. TO FIGHT.

 

It's not 'real business' is it , its common sense, anyone can see that.

Everyone has their opinion from their own standpoint , most with there MR hating hats on but you can't deny the facts.

So is every boxer who has previously failed a drugs test obligated (morally or legally) to tell every opponent he fights that they have previously failed a test ? Some of our resident PED experts on here suggest that some PED's will benefit fighters for years and years even after they've stopped taking them , who is to say their future opponents know nothing about it, where do we stand morally on that ?

 

The facts are that Whyte has failed a doping test, Joshua got sparked and isn't getting a rematch and MR is in perpetual, inexorable decline.

 

There are nuances according to UKAD, and the process is laid out in the event of results management, but there are so many different ways of things getting done that we don't know exactly what happened as it is usually confidential, we just see the results.

UKAD have ATYPICAL findings, then it can go to Adverse findings, and then there is a process of sanctions being handed out OR an hearing to establish and disect the evidence, this is a huge hearing with many, many experts independent of UKAD.

Unlike USADA who have their own hearing first, and a second stage is an independent hearing for adjudicators and men of law.

 

Oh my god, you've been reading the small print and trying to interpret it haven't you? Hahahaha!

We're living in Alice in Wonderland on here ladies and gents. Whyte fails a drug test for dianabol, yet somehow he hasn't, because ermm erm nuances and clauses.

Your idol is toast. Even if by some miracle he escapes a ban, the nearest he's getting to Green and Gold is pulling crackers over the turkey.

 

Again another breach of contract .

 

Instead of being ignorant, why don't you use your brain and get clued up on the OFFICIAL processes and the facts. Because before I rolled up in here, we had a mob chanting corruption on UKAD's part and they had NO CLUE ABOUT NADP HEARINGS AND HOW IT INDEPENDENT.

Knowledge will set you free.

Let's look at the facts, before we try and sue someone.

 

It has all the hallmarks of a case for m'learned friends...

 

https://www.ukad.org.uk/violations/results-management

Results management process for UKAD for violations as per WADA protocols on AD violations

 

He's failed a doping test for PED's. You need hourly reminding of this.

 

https://www.secondsout.com/news/new...-an-nadp-hearing-and-how-does-it-work-2959041

How NADP HEARING works following the results management process of UKAD