Based on the Whyte fiasco. Considering how shady the doping scene is in the UK, the only option is America with very stringent testing on Joshua. I don't think it's a coincidence that Joshua looked his worst ever without his "home comforts" that he gets in the UK. I fear that if the fight is in the UK, Ruiz will be in there vs an extra juiced up AJ 2.0 (with last minute glove replacements) and a matchroom ref jumping between them whenever AJ is hurt.
Do you know how stupid that sounds? APPARENTLY, UKAD picked up the Dianabol VADA didn't pick up jack and **** So what's really going on? VADA is a WBC/US affiliation. UKAD is UK Besides, USADA don't do independent hearings right off the bat, UKAD send Whyte to an independent hearing with like 50 independent professionals to scrutinize his data. In UK you get TWO YEAR BAN for PRE WORKOUT In USA you get 6 months FOR THREE HARDCORE PEDs So who is REALLY safer?
All that means is that he got his timing right for the VADA tests. The dodgy thing is that they allowed the fight to go on despite the home fighter being highly likely to have juiced up.
How could he get his timing right for VADA? How does that work? What if he fails to get the timing right, what a ridiculous risk... then he fails then WBC are informed, and they are less lenient than UKAD. And Whyte is dropped quickly from WBC rankings. They allowed the fight to go on? Who allowed it bro?
Roiding by athletes is a cat and mouse game. The athlete and his team do their best to dose in a way which would pass testing. That's why the amount which triggers a positive test is always trace amounts due to the test being done before it's completely cleared the system or taking the wrong ped by mistake/being mis-sold. About the fight going on, I don't think you can deny that UKAD, the board and team MR decided to cover it up.
I'm guessing the majority of them eat off the money generated by the big fights. But I can't keep up with you bro, you should have become a solicitor lol.
Why America, the snickers are just as good or if not better over here!!! The result will in all probabilities be the same though wherever it takes place....
Roy Jones failed a PED test during his career, which was covered up before a big fight in the USA. It happens everywhere No one wants to pull a big card when the headline is involved in a failed test, which hasnt even been through due process. What would happen if the B sample came back negative or it was in such trace amounts a ban wouldnt stand up in court?
