Dillian Whyte PED Discussion: Guilty? Not Guilty? Who Cares?

So what your saying is that if I get caught drink driving twice and i can say what does it matter you caught me the first time lol

 

How's that WBC mando spot looking? Unluckkkeeeeee

 

That's what I thought

 

It's simple...did he test positive (yes or no)?

 

Well yeah...other than the fact he tested positive, I mean unless your position is that he didn't test positive?

 

You are boring to me.

 

Dillian passed baby!!!!!!!!! Wooo

 

This is not clear cut at all. Again have to reiterate that this is clearly nothing like the Miller case.

There are no comparisons here. Miller was clearly jacked up to the eyeballs taking anything he could get his hands on.

 

Nah bro...the only important question is did he test positive for banned substances, it's a simple yes or no question? All this other stuff is just spin and nonsense.

 

Once the legal team jump on the scene, Mauricio will be saying "I kept it warm for your Mr. Dillian Whyte, my apologies"

 

So your position is he didn't test positive for banned substances? This is all a lie?

 

This is the official position, that Whyte did not test positive for any substance under VADA testing, as endorsed by the WBC.

 

It's just a contraction like the 12 days of Christmas 'eight maids a milking'

I can't link to the original due to the word censor on here but 'who killed #ock robin is a famous nursery rhyme from the uk.

 

He can suck cocks for a living now.
There was another boxer a while ago, who was exposed to be in gay porn (true story). Whyte can do something like that.

 

Ohhhhh VADA don't test for DIANABOL METABOLITES???

Ahhh makes sense, that the WBC would love VADA so much, and Wilder is passing ALL VADA tests too right???

See I thought anti-doping agencies looked for the same stuff?? Or thereabouts?

As VADA ALSO took a sample of his urine, tested it and found NO traces of a PED. Pretty straightforward, really.