Wilder v Kownacki likely next year

Well we don't like watching cherry pick jobs from Wilder & Fury times up on both boxers.
Watching Fury @ 4am v a bloke I've never heard of & Wilder v a old man he's all ready beat hmmmmmm.

 

You are the only one deflecting here not me. You say UKAD "Wouldn't like your honesty yadda yadda...."

But it is not UKAD that handle results management hearings, and this is why you will remain a dumbass for the rest of your life.

Because your inability to comprehend the above sentence, pin this post for you grandchildren to see where it all went wrong for grandad.

 

Wilder doesn't take risks, he fights guys who are at a disadvantage, like too old, or too slow, or doesn't hit hard enough to trouble him like Fury.

Whyte takes on guys like Parker who is twice as fast as him, and Rivas, who is strong, built like Mr Olympia with over 200 amateur fights to make full use of that muscle.

Whyte takes the hard fights, and thus he has been molded into a tough fighter, and he would wreck Wilder.

He ain't as "open" as people think he is, to getting hit. Not anymore than the elite boxers of today.

 

I wouldn't defend the crap fights they've booked in.

 

Haha. You're such a mug mate. It's unreal. I'm embarrassed to read your posts as are a lot of other posters as you continually make a fool of yourself. I really think you should be one of those berks who only comments on YouTube videos as people here expect a little more.

 

If it wasn't for me, no one here would have known about an NADP hearing, and I shut down the ignorance real quick.

Lucky for me, I was taught how to read so when I say things, it is factually correct. And UKAD don't run NADP hearings. I checked the documentation, and it is all kushti.

Your emotions however, ain't kushti.

 

Why are you so determined to make yourself look stupid? You can't answer basic questions and your attempts to muddy the waters here are beyond sad.

 

Why can't you accept the answer?

Your deflections are childish, and you have little support.

 

You're in the minority defending Whyte to the hilt. Why did he share VADA results so readily but not UKAD? Answer that question or go troll someone else.

 

I was also in the minority when I said he would beat Parker and Rivas....??? So??

lol, just because everyone else has an idiot opinion, I don't have to follow suite. I was right then, I will be right on Whyte getting cleared by an INDEPENDENT panel, NOT UKAD.

And you will be wrong, and you can join your buddy CutThroatFade in the HOF for posters who get things wrong most of the time.

 

Whatever you weirdo. I can't be proved wrong in this matter as what I've said is that Whyte has acted suspiciously and that is not in question. I mean you're still ducking why he hasn't properly addressed the accusations levelled at him so your posts are worthless at this point.

 

Elevating your opinion over mine? Why the bigotry though? What makes you better than any other poster here?

Whyte acting suspiciously not in question?That is subjective and your opinion.

If I say Whyte is silent due to legal reasons that is my opinion.

Ive already respected your opinion because I am the bigger man

You can at least try and act like the little man and extend me the same respect

 

You're lying again. You haven't respected my opinion. You've repeatedly lied about what I've posted and anyone who thinks radio silence in this situation isn't suspicious is clearly a fan trying to spin the situation. It was dodgy when the Furys did it and it is suspicious looking now. There is no legal reason why he couldn't confirm or deny his status with UKAD.

You keep talking about objectivity which you're incapable of achieving as you're an avowed fan. I liked Whyte previously and just want the truth here minus any spin or damage control.

So you consistently lying is why I don't value your posts.

 

So you are not saying he is a cheat, and you are not saying he won't get cleared...

But you are just suspicious? And you find his actions dodgy?

I AM COOL WITH THAT.... your opinion has my respect in the most general sense, ... that you are allowed to have one.

Glad we could clear that up.

 

That's what I've always said as my post history shows. You were the one weirdly trying to say otherwise and further muddy the water. Hence why I needed no validation of my standpoint.

If Whyte wants to remove suspicion of him he knows what he has to do.