prime Frank Bruno v Andy Ruiz who would have won?

AJ far above BRUNO,Ruiz by ko

 

Based on what? Hitting AJ? AJ has not been hit that many times but he’s been wobbled plenty. An old Klitschko nearly creamed him.

Spoon hit hard.

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

I don't like today HW division because fighters padd their records against nobodies and we have top 10 full of "undefeated" (or with less than 3 losses) fighters that don't want to fight against each other.

How can we know that Ruiz would beat active, proven contenders from other eras when he only fought 2 relevant fights in his career and he didn't win one of them? Bruno is far from all-timer, but he was powerful hitter with very good jab and he beat good fighters (and lost to good fighters). We don't know how Ruiz would fare against Bruno competition. He's unproven not because he didn't win enough fights but because he didn't fight against the best opponents available so far (other than Joshua of course).

Compare strong eras like 1890s, 1970s or 1990s and you'll know what I'm talking about.

 

And who (other than Joshua) exactly Ruiz beat that makes you so sure about it?

 

That's not an answer to my question. Bruno fared quite well against Tyson who was much quicker than Ruiz.

 

And Joshua boxed well against Ruiz? He looked weaker than ever.

 

Full credit for beating AJ but for all we know, in order to pass a drugs test in America Joshua might not have been the same fighter he was in the U.K.? And that would open a whole can of worms as to exactly what kind of level AJ is outside his home country.

Between Joshua and Ruiz which one looks most likely to have been juicing long term?