Dillian Whyte PED Discussion: Guilty? Not Guilty? Who Cares?

They give the option to open B sample or to provide solid case to explain whats going on

Whyte presented a solid case

 

Apparently the investigation is still ongoing, so we should find out what kind of case he presented.

 

Lol Who knows or even cares anymore.Still don't know what happened 're Billy Saunders and the fall out from the fight with Andrade,where he said he tested for a nasal spray?
These things seem huge at the time but often blow away.

 

That comment was around Whyte clearing his name, not the B sample. Hearn stated that they are talking to UKAD regarding legalities of putting out a statement.

 

You must see theres been a breach of ethics here?

 

Of course B sample has to be opened are you serious

 

Why of course?

Have you ever read any UKAD regulations?

 

Has there..? By who?

Due process was done. I find it funny how some "leaker" leaked the info to the journalists, but didn't bother to leak it to Rivas prior to the fight. HILARIOUS.

Absolutely, HILARIOUS.

 

@Twentyman

You were once a fan of Dillian Whyte not so long ago, and I dissapointed to see that you've lost faith in Whyte over this recent PED drama, before all the facts have come out.

I expected more loyalty from you. Why is a man guilty before he is innocent? Why can't we treat every boxer, and every PED case as a unique circumstance?

You switched boats very quickly Twenty, and jumped on the bandwagon of just pointing fingers at Whyte, and not giving him time to explain himself.

 

They won't open the B-Sample if Dillian has admitted as part of the case that he agrees there were PEDs in his system. I imagine his lawyers are trying to use the excuse that he was spiked or his food was contaminated in some way. I imagine he's just trying to drag this out and bury the case in BS Fury-style. However, I can't see anyone buying it from a two time drug cheat that got the benefit of the doubt once before. The Fury's probably wouldn't have been so lucky with their case if they'd been caught and banned in the past like Dillian already was.

 

Case ain't getting buried, like I said before a million times VADA is Whyte's guardian angle.

And VADA is going to help clear this up.

I know everyone here is like STFU about VADA, but when the news comes out, I'll be telling them to STFU.

The B sample does not HAVE TO OPENED. It is merely to show that there has been no mishandling in the extraction of the samples and transport/delivery.

Whoever thinks B sample MUST BE OPENED all the time, is an utter clown. Ignorant as ****.

Whyte has the option to provide SOLID evidence in his defense against the adverse finding, and HE HAS VERY SOLID EVIDENCE, MORE THAN ANY OTHER FIGHTER HAS EVER HAD.

Hence Whyte will get cleared.

Think I am talking bollocks..????? Bet me then? I don't write things if I ain't confident about what I write.

 

It took me a long time to get on side with Whyte and recognise that he is a legitimate world level heavyweight. Then he fails a UKAD doping test. I understand that he is bound to silence by lawyers but my feelings are we will never hear Whyte’s side of the story cos there isn’t one anyway. His only defence is the 6 or 7 VADA tests he had in the 84 day camp. I appreciate that that is enough evidence for you to clear him, but that is realistically only 1 test per 12-14 days. Dianabol has a half life of 3-5 hours. Ironic that the random UKAD test may have caught him out.

I can tolerate one fail down to ignorance/mistake/chancing it, but 2 fails is too much for me. Especially when I’d finally got on the Whyte train.

 

Fair enough, solid response.

I will continue to place my faith in Whyte as a dedicated, clean athlete until the facts are out, and the verdict has been made clear. I treat this case as an exremely unique one, and give Whyte the full benefit of the doubt given his own personal journey in the sport, and his actions in signing to voluntary, extensive, VADA testing, which speaks louder than words.

To quote someone I heard recently "A guy doesn't spend out of his own pocket for voluntary anti doping tests if he ain't clean" There is no logic in doing that. It's just not something you do.

For that reason, I am confident Whyte will be cleared with a good, solid case, not brushed under the carpet, and that WBC will be forced to reinstate Whyte as the WBC interim Champion, and that if he meets Wilder in the ring, he will beat Wilder.

 

Couldn't agree more. IMO two time PED cheats simply don't deserve the benefit of the doubt.

 

One time JACK3D, over the counter, mistake.

Like I said, if you are so sure, we can place a bet.

But you are not so sure.