Loma shouldnt be p4p #1 until he beats a solid pressure fighter

Who said I’m not a fan?

I had it a realistic 116-111 loma win.

Floyd and pac would get laughed at fighting luke Campbell because they would’ve toyed with him so bad

 

The pfp rankings are a strange place right.

Crawford is great h2h but has a had pretty stale opposition lately.

Loma looks like he has to really dig deep to beat so-so world level fighters at 135. Linares, Luke, and Pedraza are not on a level that Spence and Crawford would struggle with if they were welters.

Canelo—Has the resume, but can’t win a big fight by more than a couple points.

Usyk, Spence, Inoue—Look the part, but that level of opposition can only carry you so far.

Basically Spence needs to beat Crawford, and then pfp 1 will be a lot clearer.

 

Think of all the hate a well past prime mayweather for fighting berto.....someone who has actually won a world championship

 

Also he hadn’t lost, he was undefeated at time of first championship win

 

But Henry Brussels, Ndou, Sosa, Pirang and Velasquez are a murderers row I take it?

 

Were they all for world titles? No.

 

He was 31 in 2007.....he had lost twice to Barrerra, twice to Pacquiao, David Diaz and Zahir Raheem.

Now just think of the gloating you could have if Loma has lost to Diaz or Raheem

 

Please re-read my quote

 

Yes outside of Brussels sprout and Pirang.

 

Why you said by 31 what Morales had achieved, I suggest you re read your post.

 

So only 40% of what you said had a point. Cool

 

Morales hadn’t had his a.rse handed to him by a gatekeeper when he won his first title is my point

 

Does 2 out of 5 equate to 40% troll?

 

Changing again are we.

No he was getting slapped about by Raheem.

You failed epically.

 

I asked you were they for titles. You said outside of 3 out of 5. That would be 40% ?