I'm from the UK Inoue just a wrecking machine & can box with good footwork when needed. I wonder in his last 3 fight how many punches Inoue let go it's not many.
I do have Loma in the top three pound for pound. My point was that Loma fans make repeated excuses and try to shrink him down because he has to work a little against mediocre fighters. The man is 5'7 and about average size for a lightweight. The way truth is stretched regarding Loma is laughable. Like when Loma fans claimed Rigondeaux had the reach advantage, even though years of HBO tale of the tape stated otherwise. I've never seen people make excuses for a fighter having to work a bit in his fights, by saying he is too small repeatedly. Pedraza made him work. Campbell made him work, oh Loma is too small. Loma isn't close to being a small lightweight. Leonard Dorin was a small lightweight.
He actually did and if he had of been aware of when to press his advantage, he would have won that fight in spectacular fashion. Loma pressed at the right time and rested when he wanted to.
Calling Campbell mediocre is way too harsh. He's a talented boxer who is tall, rangy and likely big at the weight fighting as a LW. He dropped a tight loss to Linares and that was prior to working with McGuigan, who has certainly refined his game. I get your point. People make too much of a size disadvantage when fighting a mediocre opponent. Get your point and agree with it. But I don't think that narrative fits Loma vs Campbell and don't agree there is any evidence Campbell is mediocre.
It's funny you know. @The Akbar One always calls Loma fans 'ball gobblers' all the time too! what a coincidence!!! I like how you are so butthurt that Lomachenko is P4P number 1 and killing it in every way that you have felt the need to every day post from two separate accounts for years!
That's not limited to Lomotards, I've used it for Pacfiends, Floyd fans etc. And it isn't used for regular fans, only for the fans whose fondness, and truth slanting commentary for their fighter, borders on homosexual love. Loma isn't Pound for Pound #1, he's towards the top, but the more he looks lackluster against lackluster opposition, he loses that spot. Inoue is probably the #1 guy at this point in time.
Mosley is a big lightweight though. Loma is a natural featherweight, so the better question would be how does he do against the best featherweights from the past.
OK show me where you used it for Floyd fans! I've no idea how you get away with using 2 accounts, it's sad. Lomachenko is definitely the pound for pound number 1 and has been for quite a while, you really need to cope with this fact ( 95% of people say he's number 1) , it really burns you deep that he's pound for pound the best I can see that clearly. Your obsession with all things Lomachenko is disturbing, you are constantly trying to downplay his opponents and constantly searching for a hope to beat him.
I don't remember any Lomo fans even being in favour of that Rigo fight as Lomo himself didn't like it. I do remember Rigo lovers talking of "smashed jaws" was it? I think most of us with our feet on the ground expected a competitive fight and as it turned out the fight didn't go on long enough for size to be a factor.Styles makes fights and Lomo made the usually elusive Rigo quit out of embarrassment more than getting hurt.
Yep, it’s laughable that the same clowns who picked Rigo and said he would break Loma’s jaw are the same ones who said Rogo was too old and small after he was HUMILIATED with ease by Loma. Also, no one seems to mention the max hydration clause Loma agreed to before the fight. Loma didn’t win because of size, he gave up reach to Rigo. He was the better fighter in every way. I remember all of the haters picking Rigo to crush Loma. Their story changed quickly after that beating Loma gave the Cuban.