In boxing what is more vital. Forward footwork or back footwork?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lepinthehood, Sep 7, 2019.


  1. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,327
    Aug 27, 2011
    i watched a breakdown and he kept mentioning the two. your opinions please.
     
    roughdiamond likes this.
  2. pistal47

    pistal47 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,779
    4,296
    Jul 14, 2007
    Neither -- the wisdom to know when to use them each.
     
  3. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,181
    19,424
    Jul 25, 2015
    It's obviously the side to side tango twist.

    Casual.
     
    Badbot and lepinthehood like this.
  4. red_roo

    red_roo Active Member Full Member

    789
    684
    Nov 17, 2018
    Footwork side to side forward on da back foot doesn't matter witch way . It plays a big part , has to be in tune with your vision .
     
    lepinthehood likes this.
  5. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,327
    Aug 27, 2011
    Cool answer, didn't think of that.
     
    red_roo likes this.
  6. Ph33rknot

    Ph33rknot Live as if you were to die tomorrow Full Member

    22,710
    22,595
    Mar 5, 2012
  7. Xseed

    Xseed New Member Full Member

    67
    116
    Jun 8, 2014
    The answer is fairly obvious...it depends on style. Now if you're a tall and long fighter who relies more on his jab to create distance and stay safe from your opponents offense, being able to go backward will be more important than forward. On the opposite, if you're short and you need to close the distance to get your offense going, then forward footwork will be more important.

    For two opponents of similar size and length it's the same logic : the one who fights best inside will want to close distance, while the one who's better with the jab and counter-punching will want to work backward...now of course there are also good counter-puncher who can work offensively while going forward (Tyson with his head movement and angles for example).
     
  8. Angler Andrew

    Angler Andrew Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,263
    10,267
    Jun 28, 2016
    The very best are on the balls of their feet.Golovkin even now is so good at moving back n forward with the economy of movement.Only Canelo and perhaps Jacob's were good enough to work him out.
    Canelo may not have great footwork but his upper body movement and his fast hands make up for it.
    very rare does a fighter have it all,hence why guys like Usyk,Lomo and Crawford are so highly thought of.
     
    Slowhand likes this.
  9. 3rdegree

    3rdegree Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,276
    9,450
    Aug 23, 2014
    There hasn't been a successful fighter that has only utilized one directional footwork. Multidirectional footwork is even necessary for crossing the street.
     
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2019
  10. Power_tek

    Power_tek Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,805
    6,746
    Sep 22, 2018
    Correct answer and I want my dyslexionary back mate
     
    Slowhand and Ph33rknot like this.
  11. Power_tek

    Power_tek Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,805
    6,746
    Sep 22, 2018
    It’s more about weight distribution and when to remain light on your feet and when to plant yourself, well that’s not necessarily true but you can move as fluidly as you like but if you don’t distribute your weight properly on the move or you plant yourself at the wrong time then your flashy footwork is irrelevant and you are at the mercy of gravity, and sacrifice your power and become vulnerable to getting caught flush.
    Iam struggling to explain myself properly hope this makes sense
     
  12. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,531
    17,583
    Apr 3, 2012
    Bull****. Tua.
     
    Slowhand likes this.
  13. 3rdegree

    3rdegree Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,276
    9,450
    Aug 23, 2014
    I guess Tua never side-stepped?
     
  14. Slowhand

    Slowhand Member Full Member

    280
    222
    Dec 26, 2012
    I´m also pretty sure Foreman had no "reverse" in his gear box.. but those are rare exceptions.
     
    red_roo likes this.